Strategic abandonment or sincerely second best? the 1999 Israeli prime ministerial election

Published

Journal Article (Review)

The Israeli election for Prime Minister in 1999 featured five candidates. Three, including a major, centrally located candidate, Yitzhak Mordechai, withdrew from competition during the two days before the voting. Mordechai withdrew in large measure in reaction to the strategic decisions of voters, that is, some voters who favored him deserted his candidacy as his poll standings declined. We use surveys conducted during the 1999 campaign to estimate models of strategic voting behavior based on the multicandidate calculus of voting. We find that strategic voting in the Israeli, majority-with-runoff electoral system closely resembled the level and nature of strategic voting found in the more nearly pure plurality systems for which the statistical models were originally developed. The result is support for the reasoning Mordechai provided for his decision, illustrating the interlocking nature of strategic decisions between candidates and voters.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Abramson, PR; Aldrich, JH; Diamond, M; Diskin, A; Levine, R; Scotto, TJ

Published Date

  • August 1, 2004

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 66 / 3

Start / End Page

  • 706 - 728

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

  • 0022-3816

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2004.00273.x

Citation Source

  • Scopus