Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Is prostate specific antigen of clinical importance in evaluating outcome after radical prostatectomy.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Frazier, HA; Robertson, JE; Humphrey, PA; Paulson, DF
Published in: J Urol
March 1993

Current bias would conclude that elevation of serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) after radical prostatectomy infers failure of the procedure. Since April 1987 preoperative and postoperative serum PSA levels have been obtained on 226 patients who underwent radical perineal prostatectomy for presumed organ confined prostate cancer (stage T1-2N0M0). Clinical failure as defined by elevation of serum acid phosphatase, biopsy proved local recurrence or evidence of malignant disease on bone scan has occurred in 3.9% of the patients with organ confined, 7.0% with specimen confined and 13.2% with margin positive disease. However, when a PSA elevation of greater than 0.5 ng./ml. was used as an indicator of failure the failure rate became 9.8% for the organ confined group, 39.4% for the specimen confined group and 66.0% for margin positive group. Of the patients who failed clinically the interval from initial elevation of postoperative PSA to clinical detection of failure ranged from 2 to 28 months (median 16). Among the patients with an elevated postoperative PSA level but who have not clinically failed followup ranged from 4 to 46 months (median 23). A total of 11 patients had no evidence of failure at greater than 36 months despite the elevated postoperative serum PSA level. These PSA elevations in patients who undergo supposed curative therapy are distressing. However, at this time the majority of these patients have not failed. In the clinically cured patient biochemical evidence of failure may not be sufficient to change the treatment course.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Urol

DOI

ISSN

0022-5347

Publication Date

March 1993

Volume

149

Issue

3

Start / End Page

516 / 518

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Urology & Nephrology
  • Treatment Failure
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Prostatic Neoplasms
  • Prostatectomy
  • Prostate-Specific Antigen
  • Preoperative Care
  • Postoperative Period
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Frazier, H. A., Robertson, J. E., Humphrey, P. A., & Paulson, D. F. (1993). Is prostate specific antigen of clinical importance in evaluating outcome after radical prostatectomy. J Urol, 149(3), 516–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36132-3
Frazier, H. A., J. E. Robertson, P. A. Humphrey, and D. F. Paulson. “Is prostate specific antigen of clinical importance in evaluating outcome after radical prostatectomy.J Urol 149, no. 3 (March 1993): 516–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36132-3.
Frazier HA, Robertson JE, Humphrey PA, Paulson DF. Is prostate specific antigen of clinical importance in evaluating outcome after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 1993 Mar;149(3):516–8.
Frazier, H. A., et al. “Is prostate specific antigen of clinical importance in evaluating outcome after radical prostatectomy.J Urol, vol. 149, no. 3, Mar. 1993, pp. 516–18. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36132-3.
Frazier HA, Robertson JE, Humphrey PA, Paulson DF. Is prostate specific antigen of clinical importance in evaluating outcome after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 1993 Mar;149(3):516–518.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Urol

DOI

ISSN

0022-5347

Publication Date

March 1993

Volume

149

Issue

3

Start / End Page

516 / 518

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Urology & Nephrology
  • Treatment Failure
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Prostatic Neoplasms
  • Prostatectomy
  • Prostate-Specific Antigen
  • Preoperative Care
  • Postoperative Period
  • Middle Aged
  • Male