Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Microanastomotic response to needle and suture size.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Lourie, GM; Seaber, AV; Urbaniak, JR
Published in: J Reconstr Microsurg
October 1984

This study was performed to examine the microanastomotic response to needle and suture size, comparing the 10-0 (75 mu needle/22 mu suture), the 11-0 (50 mu needle/18 mu suture), and a new modified 11-0 which has a 30 mu needle and a 14 mu suture. Each artery received five full thickness sutures of either suture. The vessels were harvested at 0, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days and checked for patency, aneurysm formation, and gross strength. Histologic slides and scanning electron micrographs (SEM) were made at 7, 21, and 28 days postoperatively. The 11-0 with the 30 mu needle gave better patency rates, less incidence of aneurysm formation, and as good or better recovery in gross strength, when compared with the 10-0 75 mu needle. Histologically and by SEM, the 11-0 with the 30 mu needle was far superior to the other two larger sized sutures, showing less trauma and inflammation. The use of the modified 11-0 suture with the 30 mu needle is advantageous in anastomosis of vessels 1 mm or smaller.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Reconstr Microsurg

DOI

ISSN

0743-684X

Publication Date

October 1984

Volume

1

Issue

2

Start / End Page

135 / 138

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Wound Healing
  • Sutures
  • Surgery
  • Rats
  • Needles
  • Microsurgery
  • Male
  • Graft Occlusion, Vascular
  • Femoral Artery
  • Endothelium
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Lourie, G. M., Seaber, A. V., & Urbaniak, J. R. (1984). Microanastomotic response to needle and suture size. J Reconstr Microsurg, 1(2), 135–138. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1007065
Lourie, G. M., A. V. Seaber, and J. R. Urbaniak. “Microanastomotic response to needle and suture size.J Reconstr Microsurg 1, no. 2 (October 1984): 135–38. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1007065.
Lourie GM, Seaber AV, Urbaniak JR. Microanastomotic response to needle and suture size. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1984 Oct;1(2):135–8.
Lourie, G. M., et al. “Microanastomotic response to needle and suture size.J Reconstr Microsurg, vol. 1, no. 2, Oct. 1984, pp. 135–38. Pubmed, doi:10.1055/s-2007-1007065.
Lourie GM, Seaber AV, Urbaniak JR. Microanastomotic response to needle and suture size. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1984 Oct;1(2):135–138.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Reconstr Microsurg

DOI

ISSN

0743-684X

Publication Date

October 1984

Volume

1

Issue

2

Start / End Page

135 / 138

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Wound Healing
  • Sutures
  • Surgery
  • Rats
  • Needles
  • Microsurgery
  • Male
  • Graft Occlusion, Vascular
  • Femoral Artery
  • Endothelium