Skip to main content

Digoxin toxicity: an evaluation in current clinical practice.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Williamson, KM; Thrasher, KA; Fulton, KB; LaPointe, NM; Dunham, GD; Cooper, AA; Barrett, PS; Patterson, JH
Published in: Arch Intern Med
December 7, 1998

BACKGROUND: Serum digoxin concentrations (SDCs) are frequently sampled before completion of drug distribution. If elevated, these concentrations may be misinterpreted, potentially leading to a misdiagnosis of digoxin toxicity. OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequency of elevated SDCs (>2.6 nmol/L [>2.0 ng/mL]) obtained at appropriate postdosing intervals and to evaluate the frequency of clinically defined digoxin toxicity in patients with elevated SDCs. METHODS: The medical records of adult patients with SDCs assayed at 5 general hospitals in North Carolina during a 3-month period (May 1 through July 31, 1996) were prospectively evaluated. Data on SDC, inpatient or outpatient status, and medical or surgical service were collected for all patients. Data on patient demographics, serum chemistry values, indication for digoxin treatment, clinical evidence of digoxin toxicity, and timing of the blood sample relative to administration of the last dose of digoxin were collected for patients with SDCs higher than 2.6 nmol/L (>2.0 ng/mL). RESULTS: Of 3434 SDCs assayed in 2009 patients, 320 (9.3%) were higher than 2.6 nmol/L (>2.0 ng/mL). Fifty-one (15.9%) of the 320 SDCs were drawn at 6 hours or less following a digoxin dose. Sampling time relative to the digoxin dose could not be determined in 70 (21.9%) of the 320 elevated SDCs, leaving 199 (62.2%) of 320 SDCs in 138 patients evaluable for digoxin toxicity. Eighty-three of the 138 patients had clinical evidence of digoxin toxicity for an overall incidence of 4.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Digoxin toxicity occurs less frequently than historically reported. Continued emphasis needs to be placed on obtaining appropriately timed SDCs.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Arch Intern Med

DOI

ISSN

0003-9926

Publication Date

December 7, 1998

Volume

158

Issue

22

Start / End Page

2444 / 2449

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Time Factors
  • Poisoning
  • North Carolina
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Hospitals, General
  • General & Internal Medicine
  • Female
  • Digoxin
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Williamson, K. M., Thrasher, K. A., Fulton, K. B., LaPointe, N. M., Dunham, G. D., Cooper, A. A., … Patterson, J. H. (1998). Digoxin toxicity: an evaluation in current clinical practice. Arch Intern Med, 158(22), 2444–2449. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.158.22.2444
Williamson, K. M., K. A. Thrasher, K. B. Fulton, N. M. LaPointe, G. D. Dunham, A. A. Cooper, P. S. Barrett, and J. H. Patterson. “Digoxin toxicity: an evaluation in current clinical practice.Arch Intern Med 158, no. 22 (December 7, 1998): 2444–49. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.158.22.2444.
Williamson KM, Thrasher KA, Fulton KB, LaPointe NM, Dunham GD, Cooper AA, et al. Digoxin toxicity: an evaluation in current clinical practice. Arch Intern Med. 1998 Dec 7;158(22):2444–9.
Williamson, K. M., et al. “Digoxin toxicity: an evaluation in current clinical practice.Arch Intern Med, vol. 158, no. 22, Dec. 1998, pp. 2444–49. Pubmed, doi:10.1001/archinte.158.22.2444.
Williamson KM, Thrasher KA, Fulton KB, LaPointe NM, Dunham GD, Cooper AA, Barrett PS, Patterson JH. Digoxin toxicity: an evaluation in current clinical practice. Arch Intern Med. 1998 Dec 7;158(22):2444–2449.

Published In

Arch Intern Med

DOI

ISSN

0003-9926

Publication Date

December 7, 1998

Volume

158

Issue

22

Start / End Page

2444 / 2449

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Time Factors
  • Poisoning
  • North Carolina
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Hospitals, General
  • General & Internal Medicine
  • Female
  • Digoxin