Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Kinetochore rearrangement in meiosis II requires attachment to the spindle.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Paliulis, LV; Nicklas, RB
Published in: Chromosoma
March 2005

The distinctive behaviors of chromosomes in mitosis and meiosis depend upon differences in kinetochore position. Kinetochore position is well established except for a critical transition between meiosis I and meiosis II. We examined kinetochore position during the transition and compared it with the position of kinetochores in mitosis. Immunofluorescence staining using the 3F3/2 antibody showed that in mitosis in grasshopper cells, as in other organisms, kinetochores are positioned on opposite sides of the two sister chromatids. In meiosis I, sister kinetochores are positioned side by side. At nuclear envelope breakdown in meiosis II, sister kinetochores are still side by side, but are separated by the time all chromosomes have fully attached in metaphase II. Micromanipulation experiments reveal that this switch from side-by-side to separated sister kinetochores requires attachment to the spindle. Moreover, it is irreversible, as chromosomes detached from a metaphase II spindle retain separate kinetochores. How this critical separation of sister kinetochores occurs in meiosis is uncertain, but clearly it is not built into the chromosome before nuclear envelope breakdown, as it is in mitosis.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Chromosoma

DOI

EISSN

1432-0886

ISSN

0009-5915

Publication Date

March 2005

Volume

113

Issue

8

Start / End Page

440 / 446

Related Subject Headings

  • Spindle Apparatus
  • Spermatocytes
  • Mitosis
  • Microscopy, Phase-Contrast
  • Meiosis
  • Male
  • Kinetochores
  • Grasshoppers
  • Fluorescent Antibody Technique
  • Developmental Biology
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Paliulis, L. V., & Nicklas, R. B. (2005). Kinetochore rearrangement in meiosis II requires attachment to the spindle. Chromosoma, 113(8), 440–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00412-005-0330-z
Paliulis, Leocadia V., and R Bruce Nicklas. “Kinetochore rearrangement in meiosis II requires attachment to the spindle.Chromosoma 113, no. 8 (March 2005): 440–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00412-005-0330-z.
Paliulis LV, Nicklas RB. Kinetochore rearrangement in meiosis II requires attachment to the spindle. Chromosoma. 2005 Mar;113(8):440–6.
Paliulis, Leocadia V., and R. Bruce Nicklas. “Kinetochore rearrangement in meiosis II requires attachment to the spindle.Chromosoma, vol. 113, no. 8, Mar. 2005, pp. 440–46. Epmc, doi:10.1007/s00412-005-0330-z.
Paliulis LV, Nicklas RB. Kinetochore rearrangement in meiosis II requires attachment to the spindle. Chromosoma. 2005 Mar;113(8):440–446.
Journal cover image

Published In

Chromosoma

DOI

EISSN

1432-0886

ISSN

0009-5915

Publication Date

March 2005

Volume

113

Issue

8

Start / End Page

440 / 446

Related Subject Headings

  • Spindle Apparatus
  • Spermatocytes
  • Mitosis
  • Microscopy, Phase-Contrast
  • Meiosis
  • Male
  • Kinetochores
  • Grasshoppers
  • Fluorescent Antibody Technique
  • Developmental Biology