Skip to main content
Journal cover image

The current practice of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation: results from the Benchmark Registry.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Ferguson, JJ; Cohen, M; Freedman, RJ; Stone, GW; Miller, MF; Joseph, DL; Ohman, EM
Published in: J Am Coll Cardiol
November 1, 2001

OBJECTIVES: This study presents clinical data from the first large registry of aortic counterpulsation, a computerized database that incorporates prospectively gathered data on indications for intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) use, patient demographics, concomitant medication and in-hospital outcomes and complications. BACKGROUND: The intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is widely used to provide circulatory support for patients experiencing hemodynamic instability due to myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, or in very high risk patients undergoing angioplasty or coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: Between June 1996 and August 2000, 203 hospitals worldwide (90% U.S., 10% non-U.S.) collected 16,909 patient case records (68.8% men, 31.2% women; mean age 65.9 +/- 11.7 years). RESULTS: The most frequent indications for use of IABP were as follows: to provide hemodynamic support during or after cardiac catheterization (20.6%), cardiogenic shock (18.8%), weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass (16.1%), preoperative use in high risk patients (13.0%) and refractory unstable angina (12.3%). Major IABP complications (major limb ischemia, severe bleeding, balloon leak, death directly due to IABP insertion or failure) occurred in 2.6% of cases; in-hospital mortality was 21.2% (11.6% with the balloon in place). Female gender, high age and peripheral vascular disease were independent predictors of a serious complication. CONCLUSIONS: This registry provides a useful tool for monitoring the evolving practice of IABP. In the modern-day practice of IABP, complication rates are generally low, although in-hospital mortality remains high. There is an increased risk of major complications in women, older patients and patients with peripheral vascular disease.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Am Coll Cardiol

DOI

ISSN

0735-1097

Publication Date

November 1, 2001

Volume

38

Issue

5

Start / End Page

1456 / 1462

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Shock, Cardiogenic
  • Risk Factors
  • Registries
  • Prospective Studies
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians'
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Patient Selection
  • Middle Aged
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Ferguson, J. J., Cohen, M., Freedman, R. J., Stone, G. W., Miller, M. F., Joseph, D. L., & Ohman, E. M. (2001). The current practice of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation: results from the Benchmark Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol, 38(5), 1456–1462. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01553-4
Ferguson, J. J., M. Cohen, R. J. Freedman, G. W. Stone, M. F. Miller, D. L. Joseph, and E. M. Ohman. “The current practice of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation: results from the Benchmark Registry.J Am Coll Cardiol 38, no. 5 (November 1, 2001): 1456–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01553-4.
Ferguson JJ, Cohen M, Freedman RJ, Stone GW, Miller MF, Joseph DL, et al. The current practice of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation: results from the Benchmark Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Nov 1;38(5):1456–62.
Ferguson, J. J., et al. “The current practice of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation: results from the Benchmark Registry.J Am Coll Cardiol, vol. 38, no. 5, Nov. 2001, pp. 1456–62. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01553-4.
Ferguson JJ, Cohen M, Freedman RJ, Stone GW, Miller MF, Joseph DL, Ohman EM. The current practice of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation: results from the Benchmark Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Nov 1;38(5):1456–1462.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Am Coll Cardiol

DOI

ISSN

0735-1097

Publication Date

November 1, 2001

Volume

38

Issue

5

Start / End Page

1456 / 1462

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Shock, Cardiogenic
  • Risk Factors
  • Registries
  • Prospective Studies
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians'
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Patient Selection
  • Middle Aged