Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Ultrasonic recognition of the small-for-gestational-age fetus.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Brown, HL; Miller, JM; Gabert, HA; Kissling, G
Published in: Obstet Gynecol
April 1987

Sonar biparietal diameter, femur length, abdominal circumference, femur length/abdominal circumference ratio, ponderal index, and estimated fetal weight were obtained within ten days of delivery of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) (N = 102) and non-SGA (N = 204) newborns. The effectiveness of each ultrasound variable in the antenatal recognition of the SGA fetus was assessed. An abnormal abdominal circumference was the best predictor, confirming SGA in 98% of cases. Other variables (biparietal diameter, femur length, femur length/abdominal circumference ratio, ponderal index, or estimated fetal weight) were less accurate for predicting SGA. When we determined expected results based on a 10% prevalence of SGA, negative predictive value was greater than 92% for all variables studied; however, with the exception of estimated fetal weight and femur length, positive predictive values were disappointing, including abdominal circumference (21%). This report establishes the limits of ultrasound-derived growth variables in the antenatal identification of the SGA fetus.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Obstet Gynecol

ISSN

0029-7844

Publication Date

April 1987

Volume

69

Issue

4

Start / End Page

631 / 635

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Ultrasonography
  • Prognosis
  • Prenatal Diagnosis
  • Pregnancy
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Infant, Small for Gestational Age
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Humans
  • Fetal Growth Retardation
  • Female
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Brown, H. L., Miller, J. M., Gabert, H. A., & Kissling, G. (1987). Ultrasonic recognition of the small-for-gestational-age fetus. Obstet Gynecol, 69(4), 631–635.
Brown, H. L., J. M. Miller, H. A. Gabert, and G. Kissling. “Ultrasonic recognition of the small-for-gestational-age fetus.Obstet Gynecol 69, no. 4 (April 1987): 631–35.
Brown HL, Miller JM, Gabert HA, Kissling G. Ultrasonic recognition of the small-for-gestational-age fetus. Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Apr;69(4):631–5.
Brown, H. L., et al. “Ultrasonic recognition of the small-for-gestational-age fetus.Obstet Gynecol, vol. 69, no. 4, Apr. 1987, pp. 631–35.
Brown HL, Miller JM, Gabert HA, Kissling G. Ultrasonic recognition of the small-for-gestational-age fetus. Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Apr;69(4):631–635.
Journal cover image

Published In

Obstet Gynecol

ISSN

0029-7844

Publication Date

April 1987

Volume

69

Issue

4

Start / End Page

631 / 635

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Ultrasonography
  • Prognosis
  • Prenatal Diagnosis
  • Pregnancy
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Infant, Small for Gestational Age
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Humans
  • Fetal Growth Retardation
  • Female