Quantitating bedside diagnosis: clinical evaluation of ascites.
The authors prospectively evaluated the operating characteristics of the history and physical examination for ascites in a broad spectrum of hospitalized patients. The overall clinical evaluation produced a positive likelihood ratio = 37.7-83.3 when suggestive of ascites, a likelihood ratio = 2.23-3.42 when intermediate, and a negative likelihood ratio = 0.77-0.90 when not suggestive of ascites. Patients' perceptions of increased abdominal girth (positive likelihood ratio = 4.16) or recent weight gain (positive likelihood ratio = 3.20) increased the likelihood of ascites. The absence of subjective ankle swelling (negative likelihood ratio = 0.10) or increased abdominal girth (negative likelihood ratio = 0.17) decreased the likelihood of ascites. The positive likelihood ratios for a fluid wave = 9.6 and shifting dullness = 5.76 favored ascites, while the absence of bulging flanks (negative likelihood ratio = 0.12) or peripheral edema (negative likelihood ratio = 0.17) favored ascites the least. Thus, a routine history and physical examination are quantitatively useful in the clinical evaluation of ascites.
Duke Scholars
Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats
Published In
DOI
ISSN
Publication Date
Volume
Issue
Start / End Page
Location
Related Subject Headings
- Ultrasonography
- Prospective Studies
- Probability
- Physical Examination
- Medical History Taking
- Male
- Humans
- General & Internal Medicine
- Ascites
- 1103 Clinical Sciences
Citation
Published In
DOI
ISSN
Publication Date
Volume
Issue
Start / End Page
Location
Related Subject Headings
- Ultrasonography
- Prospective Studies
- Probability
- Physical Examination
- Medical History Taking
- Male
- Humans
- General & Internal Medicine
- Ascites
- 1103 Clinical Sciences