Skip to main content

Observer studies of cardiac lesion detectability with triple-head 360° versus dual-head 180° SPECT acquisition using simulated projection data

Publication ,  Journal Article
Chen, M; Peter, J; Jaszczak, RJ; Gilland, DR; Bowsher, JE; Tornai, MP; Metzler, SD
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science
June 1, 2002

The purpose of this study is to evaluate cardiac lesion detectability with triple-head 360° versus dual-head 180° myocardial perfusion SPECT scans with equal acquisition time. The channelized Hotelling observer (CHO) and human observers were used. A male and a female voxelized cardiac-torso phantoms were used to generate the 360° and the 180° projection data. A cold lesion was placed in eight different locations of myocardium and had a lesion contrast of 25%. Sixteen time frames of the cardiac cycle were averaged to create the cardiac motion blurring to simulate the clinical ungated scan. Sufficient Poisson noise was added to set the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (A z) to be between 0.75 and 0.85 in a pilot study and to simulate the clinical case where dual-head 180° and triple-head 360° scans both have the same total acquisition time. For each lesion location, multiple realizations of lesion-present and of lesion-absent data were generated. Five-iteration ordered subsets expectation maximization with eight subsets was used to reconstruct the data. There was no attenuation correction (AC) in reconstruction with images used in the human study, while CHO was applied on images both reconstructed with and without AC. A three-dimensional Hann filter with 0.7 times the Nyquist frequency was used to smooth the reconstructed images. For images reconstructed without AC, both the CHO and the human observer study showed better detection performance for the 180° scan, especially for the female phantom. For images reconstructed with AC, the CHO study showed better detection performance for the 360° scan, especially for the female phantom. The CHO results demonstrated the detection performance with 360° scan was improved more than with 180° scan after AC.

Duke Scholars

Published In

IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science

DOI

ISSN

0018-9499

Publication Date

June 1, 2002

Volume

49 I

Issue

3

Start / End Page

655 / 660

Related Subject Headings

  • Nuclear & Particles Physics
  • 5106 Nuclear and plasma physics
  • 0903 Biomedical Engineering
  • 0299 Other Physical Sciences
  • 0202 Atomic, Molecular, Nuclear, Particle and Plasma Physics
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Chen, M., Peter, J., Jaszczak, R. J., Gilland, D. R., Bowsher, J. E., Tornai, M. P., & Metzler, S. D. (2002). Observer studies of cardiac lesion detectability with triple-head 360° versus dual-head 180° SPECT acquisition using simulated projection data. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 49 I(3), 655–660. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2002.1039545
Chen, M., J. Peter, R. J. Jaszczak, D. R. Gilland, J. E. Bowsher, M. P. Tornai, and S. D. Metzler. “Observer studies of cardiac lesion detectability with triple-head 360° versus dual-head 180° SPECT acquisition using simulated projection data.” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 49 I, no. 3 (June 1, 2002): 655–60. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2002.1039545.
Chen M, Peter J, Jaszczak RJ, Gilland DR, Bowsher JE, Tornai MP, et al. Observer studies of cardiac lesion detectability with triple-head 360° versus dual-head 180° SPECT acquisition using simulated projection data. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. 2002 Jun 1;49 I(3):655–60.
Chen, M., et al. “Observer studies of cardiac lesion detectability with triple-head 360° versus dual-head 180° SPECT acquisition using simulated projection data.” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 49 I, no. 3, June 2002, pp. 655–60. Scopus, doi:10.1109/TNS.2002.1039545.
Chen M, Peter J, Jaszczak RJ, Gilland DR, Bowsher JE, Tornai MP, Metzler SD. Observer studies of cardiac lesion detectability with triple-head 360° versus dual-head 180° SPECT acquisition using simulated projection data. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. 2002 Jun 1;49 I(3):655–660.

Published In

IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science

DOI

ISSN

0018-9499

Publication Date

June 1, 2002

Volume

49 I

Issue

3

Start / End Page

655 / 660

Related Subject Headings

  • Nuclear & Particles Physics
  • 5106 Nuclear and plasma physics
  • 0903 Biomedical Engineering
  • 0299 Other Physical Sciences
  • 0202 Atomic, Molecular, Nuclear, Particle and Plasma Physics