Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Racial differences in tumor grade among women with endometrial cancer.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Hill, HA; Coates, RJ; Austin, H; Correa, P; Robboy, SJ; Chen, V; Click, LA; Barrett, RJ; Boyce, JG; Kotz, HL
Published in: Gynecol Oncol
February 1995

Black women with endometrial cancer have more advanced disease and less favorable tumor grade than do white women. This study evaluated whether racial differences in tumor grade could be explained by hormone-related factors and other putative determinants of grade. Subjects included 207 white and 81 black postmenopausal women diagnosed with primary cancer of the uterine corpus between 1985 and 1987. Blacks had poorer tumor grade than whites (odds ratio for FIGO grade 2 versus grade 1 is 1.8; odds ratio for grade 3 versus grade 1 is 2.8). Over 75% of the excess of poorly differentiated tumors versus well-differentiated tumors among blacks could be explained by racial differences in use of replacement estrogens, age at first pregnancy, history of oophorectomy, poverty, stage of disease, use of screening, and access to health care. The most prominent factor was estrogen therapy, which was associated with favorable tumor grade and was used much less frequently by blacks. Although not statistically significant, a moderate racial difference in tumor grade remained after control of the potential explanatory explanatory variables. This may reflect true biologic variation between blacks and whites and may explain, in part, the observation that blacks with endometrial cancer have a worse prognosis.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Gynecol Oncol

DOI

ISSN

0090-8258

Publication Date

February 1995

Volume

56

Issue

2

Start / End Page

154 / 163

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • White People
  • United States
  • Socioeconomic Factors
  • Risk Factors
  • Regression Analysis
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • Odds Ratio
  • Middle Aged
  • Humans
  • Female
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Hill, H. A., Coates, R. J., Austin, H., Correa, P., Robboy, S. J., Chen, V., … Kotz, H. L. (1995). Racial differences in tumor grade among women with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol, 56(2), 154–163. https://doi.org/10.1006/gyno.1995.1024
Hill, H. A., R. J. Coates, H. Austin, P. Correa, S. J. Robboy, V. Chen, L. A. Click, R. J. Barrett, J. G. Boyce, and H. L. Kotz. “Racial differences in tumor grade among women with endometrial cancer.Gynecol Oncol 56, no. 2 (February 1995): 154–63. https://doi.org/10.1006/gyno.1995.1024.
Hill HA, Coates RJ, Austin H, Correa P, Robboy SJ, Chen V, et al. Racial differences in tumor grade among women with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 1995 Feb;56(2):154–63.
Hill, H. A., et al. “Racial differences in tumor grade among women with endometrial cancer.Gynecol Oncol, vol. 56, no. 2, Feb. 1995, pp. 154–63. Pubmed, doi:10.1006/gyno.1995.1024.
Hill HA, Coates RJ, Austin H, Correa P, Robboy SJ, Chen V, Click LA, Barrett RJ, Boyce JG, Kotz HL. Racial differences in tumor grade among women with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 1995 Feb;56(2):154–163.
Journal cover image

Published In

Gynecol Oncol

DOI

ISSN

0090-8258

Publication Date

February 1995

Volume

56

Issue

2

Start / End Page

154 / 163

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • White People
  • United States
  • Socioeconomic Factors
  • Risk Factors
  • Regression Analysis
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • Odds Ratio
  • Middle Aged
  • Humans
  • Female