The case against independent monitoring committees.
Publication
, Journal Article
Harrington, D; Crowley, J; George, SL; Pajak, T; Redmond, C; Wieand, S
Published in: Stat Med
July 15, 1994
Duke Scholars
Published In
Stat Med
DOI
ISSN
0277-6715
Publication Date
July 15, 1994
Volume
13
Issue
13-14
Start / End Page
1411 / 1414
Location
England
Related Subject Headings
- Treatment Outcome
- Survival Analysis
- Statistics & Probability
- Reproducibility of Results
- Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
- Neoplasms
- Humans
- Follow-Up Studies
- Data Interpretation, Statistical
- Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Harrington, D., Crowley, J., George, S. L., Pajak, T., Redmond, C., & Wieand, S. (1994). The case against independent monitoring committees. Stat Med, 13(13–14), 1411–1414. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780131316
Harrington, D., J. Crowley, S. L. George, T. Pajak, C. Redmond, and S. Wieand. “The case against independent monitoring committees.” Stat Med 13, no. 13–14 (July 15, 1994): 1411–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780131316.
Harrington D, Crowley J, George SL, Pajak T, Redmond C, Wieand S. The case against independent monitoring committees. Stat Med. 1994 Jul 15;13(13–14):1411–4.
Harrington, D., et al. “The case against independent monitoring committees.” Stat Med, vol. 13, no. 13–14, July 1994, pp. 1411–14. Pubmed, doi:10.1002/sim.4780131316.
Harrington D, Crowley J, George SL, Pajak T, Redmond C, Wieand S. The case against independent monitoring committees. Stat Med. 1994 Jul 15;13(13–14):1411–1414.
Published In
Stat Med
DOI
ISSN
0277-6715
Publication Date
July 15, 1994
Volume
13
Issue
13-14
Start / End Page
1411 / 1414
Location
England
Related Subject Headings
- Treatment Outcome
- Survival Analysis
- Statistics & Probability
- Reproducibility of Results
- Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
- Neoplasms
- Humans
- Follow-Up Studies
- Data Interpretation, Statistical
- Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic