Common comorbidity scales were similar in their ability to predict health care costs and mortality.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the ability of commonly used measures of medical comorbidity (ambulatory care groups [ACGs], Charlson comorbidity index, chronic disease score, number of prescribed medications, and number of chronic diseases) to predict mortality and health care costs over 1 year. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A prospective cohort study of community-dwelling older adults (n=3,496) attending a large primary care practice. RESULTS: For predicting health care charges, the number of medications had the highest predictive validity (R(2)=13.6%) after adjusting for demographics. ACGs (R(2)=16.4%) and the number of medications (15.0%) had the highest predictive validity for predicting ambulatory visits. ACGs and the Charlson comorbidity index (area under the receiver operator characteristic [ROC] curve=0.695-0.767) performed better than medication-based measures (area under the ROC curve=0.662-0.679) for predicting mortality. There is relatively little difference, however, in the predictive validity across these scales. CONCLUSION: In an outpatient setting, a simple count of medications may be the most efficient comorbidity measure for predicting utilization and health-care charges over the ensuing year. In contrast, diagnosis-based measures have greater predictive validity for 1-year mortality. Current comorbidity measures, however, have only poor to moderate predictive validity for costs or mortality over 1 year.
Perkins, AJ; Kroenke, K; Unützer, J; Katon, W; Williams, JW; Hope, C; Callahan, CM
Volume / Issue
Start / End Page
Pubmed Central ID
International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)