Skip to main content
construction release_alert
Scholars@Duke will be undergoing maintenance April 11-15. Some features may be unavailable during this time.
cancel
Journal cover image

An analysis of time and staff utilization for open versus percutaneous tracheostomies.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Kaylie, DM; Andersen, PE; Wax, MK
Published in: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
January 2003

OBJECTIVE: We examined staff utilization and procedure length for percutaneous and open bedside tracheostomies in an intensive care setting. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical outcomes study. METHODS: Intensive care unit (ICU) tracheostomy consults meeting criteria for bedside procedures were randomized to open or percutaneous procedures. The Cook percutaneous kit and a prepackaged tracheostomy tray were used. ICU nursing and respiratory therapy staff was present for all procedures. The total resident time, staff time, and procedure length were recorded. Twelve patients underwent percutaneous tracheostomy, and 12 received an open tracheostomy. RESULTS: An operating room nurse was present for 7 of the open procedures. Ancillary medical staff was present for 3 open tracheostomies: anesthesia for 2 and critical care for 1. Ancillary medical staff was present for 4 percutaneous tracheostomies: anesthesia staff for 1 and critical care for 3. The average resident presence, staff presence, and procedure length for open tracheostomies were 47, 30, and 12 minutes, respectively. For percutaneous tracheostomies, the times were 39, 29, and 12 minutes, respectively. One intraoperative complication occurred during a percutaneous procedure and 2 perioperative complications occurred: 1 in the open group and 1 in the percutaneous group. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in procedure length, resident time, or staff time between the 2 procedures. Ancillary staff was occasionally used but was not thought to be necessary for the majority of procedures. Both procedures can be safely and expediently performed in the ICU.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

DOI

ISSN

0194-5998

Publication Date

January 2003

Volume

128

Issue

1

Start / End Page

109 / 114

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Tracheostomy
  • Time Factors
  • Surgical Procedures, Operative
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Prospective Studies
  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
  • Middle Aged
  • Medical Staff, Hospital
  • Male
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Kaylie, D. M., Andersen, P. E., & Wax, M. K. (2003). An analysis of time and staff utilization for open versus percutaneous tracheostomies. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 128(1), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1067/mhn.2003.18
Kaylie, David M., Peter E. Andersen, and Mark K. Wax. “An analysis of time and staff utilization for open versus percutaneous tracheostomies.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128, no. 1 (January 2003): 109–14. https://doi.org/10.1067/mhn.2003.18.
Kaylie DM, Andersen PE, Wax MK. An analysis of time and staff utilization for open versus percutaneous tracheostomies. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 Jan;128(1):109–14.
Kaylie, David M., et al. “An analysis of time and staff utilization for open versus percutaneous tracheostomies.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, vol. 128, no. 1, Jan. 2003, pp. 109–14. Pubmed, doi:10.1067/mhn.2003.18.
Kaylie DM, Andersen PE, Wax MK. An analysis of time and staff utilization for open versus percutaneous tracheostomies. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 Jan;128(1):109–114.
Journal cover image

Published In

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

DOI

ISSN

0194-5998

Publication Date

January 2003

Volume

128

Issue

1

Start / End Page

109 / 114

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Tracheostomy
  • Time Factors
  • Surgical Procedures, Operative
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Prospective Studies
  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
  • Middle Aged
  • Medical Staff, Hospital
  • Male