Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Effect of outpatient treatment of febrile neutropenia on the risk threshold for the use of CSF in patients with cancer treated with chemotherapy.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Cosler, LE; Sivasubramaniam, V; Agboola, O; Crawford, J; Dale, D; Lyman, GH
Published in: Value Health
2005

OBJECTIVES: Febrile neutropenia (FN) in patients with cancer treated with chemotherapy has traditionally been managed with inpatient broad-spectrum antibiotics until the infection and neutropenia have resolved. A newer strategy is outpatient oral or intravenous antibiotics in selected patients after an initial hospitalization. We sought to determine these costs, both overall and relative to those of traditional management, and the optimal role of prophylactic colony-stimulating factor (CSF) in patients at greatest risk for FN. METHODS: Existing economic decision models were modified by incorporating a treatment strategy for FN in which patients are classified as high- and low-risk according to criteria described by Talcott. Low-risk patients were assumed to be treated as outpatients. Overall costs with the revised economic model were assessed and sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: The costs of an episode of FN were estimated as 1) no CSF: dollar 13,355; 2) CSF with hospitalization for FN: dollar 8677; and 3) CSF with risk stratification and outpatient management in low-risk patients: dollar 8188. The risk threshold for the cost-effective use of CSF was only slightly lower with outpatient treatment. When all patients with FN are treated as inpatients and the cost of hospitalization is dollar 1750/day the risk threshold for FN at which prophylactic CSF becomes cost-effective is 16%. It is 15% when low-risk patients are treated as outpatients. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient treatment slightly decreases the risk threshold for FN at which prophylactic CSF becomes cost-effective. The limited economic effect of this strategy may be because the patients who were at greatest risk of complications had significantly longer lengths of stay and accounted for most of the hospitalization costs.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Value Health

DOI

ISSN

1098-3015

Publication Date

2005

Volume

8

Issue

1

Start / End Page

47 / 52

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Risk Factors
  • Risk Assessment
  • Patient Selection
  • New York
  • Neutropenia
  • Neoplasms
  • Models, Econometric
  • Length of Stay
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Cosler, L. E., Sivasubramaniam, V., Agboola, O., Crawford, J., Dale, D., & Lyman, G. H. (2005). Effect of outpatient treatment of febrile neutropenia on the risk threshold for the use of CSF in patients with cancer treated with chemotherapy. Value Health, 8(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.03099.x
Cosler, Leon E., Visaharan Sivasubramaniam, Olayemi Agboola, Jeffrey Crawford, David Dale, and Gary H. Lyman. “Effect of outpatient treatment of febrile neutropenia on the risk threshold for the use of CSF in patients with cancer treated with chemotherapy.Value Health 8, no. 1 (2005): 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.03099.x.
Cosler LE, Sivasubramaniam V, Agboola O, Crawford J, Dale D, Lyman GH. Effect of outpatient treatment of febrile neutropenia on the risk threshold for the use of CSF in patients with cancer treated with chemotherapy. Value Health. 2005;8(1):47–52.
Cosler, Leon E., et al. “Effect of outpatient treatment of febrile neutropenia on the risk threshold for the use of CSF in patients with cancer treated with chemotherapy.Value Health, vol. 8, no. 1, 2005, pp. 47–52. Pubmed, doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.03099.x.
Cosler LE, Sivasubramaniam V, Agboola O, Crawford J, Dale D, Lyman GH. Effect of outpatient treatment of febrile neutropenia on the risk threshold for the use of CSF in patients with cancer treated with chemotherapy. Value Health. 2005;8(1):47–52.
Journal cover image

Published In

Value Health

DOI

ISSN

1098-3015

Publication Date

2005

Volume

8

Issue

1

Start / End Page

47 / 52

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Risk Factors
  • Risk Assessment
  • Patient Selection
  • New York
  • Neutropenia
  • Neoplasms
  • Models, Econometric
  • Length of Stay