Skip to main content

Response rates to a mailed survey targeting childhood cancer survivors: a comparison of conditional versus unconditional incentives.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Rosoff, PM; Werner, C; Clipp, EC; Guill, AB; Bonner, M; Demark-Wahnefried, W
Published in: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
May 2005

OBJECTIVE: Mailed surveys are widely used to collect epidemiologic and health service data. Given that nonresponse can threaten the validity of surveys, modest incentives are often used to increase response rates. A study was undertaken among childhood cancer survivors and their parents to determine if response rate to a mailed survey differed with provision of immediate versus delayed incentives. DESIGN: A self-administered survey designed to ascertain health behaviors was mailed to 397 childhood cancer survivors (and their parents if the survivor was <18 years of age). Subjects were randomized into two groups based on gender, age, race, and cancer type. One group received a 10 US dollars incentive with their blank survey (unconditional incentive), whereas the other group received the incentive upon receipt of their completed survey (conditional incentive). If children were minors, both the parent and the child received incentives. RESULTS: No significant differences in response rates were observed with respect to gender, age, race, or cancer type. However, significant differences in response rates were observed between incentive groups, with unconditional incentives yielding significantly higher response rates than conditional incentives for child survivors who were > or =18 years (64.4% versus 49.0%), as well as younger child survivors (62.5% versus 43.6%) and their parents (64.8% versus 41.5%; all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The provision of an immediate incentive generated significantly higher response rates to this mailed health survey among childhood cancer survivors and their parents. Given that survey studies are commonly conducted across various pediatric populations, these findings may help inform the design of future pediatric survey research.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev

DOI

ISSN

1055-9965

Publication Date

May 2005

Volume

14

Issue

5

Start / End Page

1330 / 1332

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Token Economy
  • Survivors
  • Research Design
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Registries
  • Postal Service
  • Parents
  • North Carolina
  • Neoplasms
  • Motivation
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Rosoff, P. M., Werner, C., Clipp, E. C., Guill, A. B., Bonner, M., & Demark-Wahnefried, W. (2005). Response rates to a mailed survey targeting childhood cancer survivors: a comparison of conditional versus unconditional incentives. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 14(5), 1330–1332. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0716
Rosoff, Philip M., Cary Werner, Elizabeth C. Clipp, Ann Bebe Guill, Melanie Bonner, and Wendy Demark-Wahnefried. “Response rates to a mailed survey targeting childhood cancer survivors: a comparison of conditional versus unconditional incentives.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14, no. 5 (May 2005): 1330–32. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0716.
Rosoff PM, Werner C, Clipp EC, Guill AB, Bonner M, Demark-Wahnefried W. Response rates to a mailed survey targeting childhood cancer survivors: a comparison of conditional versus unconditional incentives. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 May;14(5):1330–2.
Rosoff, Philip M., et al. “Response rates to a mailed survey targeting childhood cancer survivors: a comparison of conditional versus unconditional incentives.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, vol. 14, no. 5, May 2005, pp. 1330–32. Pubmed, doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0716.
Rosoff PM, Werner C, Clipp EC, Guill AB, Bonner M, Demark-Wahnefried W. Response rates to a mailed survey targeting childhood cancer survivors: a comparison of conditional versus unconditional incentives. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 May;14(5):1330–1332.

Published In

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev

DOI

ISSN

1055-9965

Publication Date

May 2005

Volume

14

Issue

5

Start / End Page

1330 / 1332

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Token Economy
  • Survivors
  • Research Design
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Registries
  • Postal Service
  • Parents
  • North Carolina
  • Neoplasms
  • Motivation