Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Mechanism of dynamic visual acuity recovery with vestibular rehabilitation.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Schubert, MC; Migliaccio, AA; Clendaniel, RA; Allak, A; Carey, JP
Published in: Arch Phys Med Rehabil
March 2008

OBJECTIVE: To determine why dynamic visual acuity (DVA) improves after vestibular rehabilitation in people with vestibular hypofunction. DESIGN: Combined descriptive and intervention study. SETTING: Outpatient department in an academic medical institution. PARTICIPANTS: Five patients (age, 42-66 y) and 4 age-matched controls (age, 39-67 y) were studied. Patients had vestibular hypofunction (mean duration, 177+/-188 d) identified by clinical (positive head thrust test, abnormal DVA), physiologic (reduced angular vestibulo-ocular reflex [aVOR] gain during passive head thrust testing), and imaging examinations (absence of tumor in the internal auditory canals or cerebellopontine angle). INTERVENTION: Vestibular rehabilitation focused on gaze and gait stabilization (mean, 5.0+/-1.4 visits; mean, 66+/-24 d). The control group did not receive any intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: aVOR gain (eye velocity/head velocity) during DVA testing (active head rotation) and horizontal head thrust testing (passive head rotation) to control for spontaneous recovery. RESULTS: For all patients, DVA improved (mean, 51%+/-25%; range, 21%-81%). aVOR gain during the active DVA test increased in each of the patients (mean range, 0.7+/-0.2 to 0.9+/-0.2 [35%]). aVOR gain during passive head thrust did not improve in 3 patients and improved only partially in the other 2. For control subjects, aVOR gain during DVA was near 1. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that vestibular rehabilitation increases aVOR gain during active head rotation independent of peripheral aVOR gain recovery.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Arch Phys Med Rehabil

DOI

EISSN

1532-821X

Publication Date

March 2008

Volume

89

Issue

3

Start / End Page

500 / 507

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Visual Acuity
  • Vestibular Function Tests
  • Vestibular Diseases
  • Vertigo
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Risk Assessment
  • Rehabilitation
  • Reflex, Vestibulo-Ocular
  • Reference Values
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Schubert, M. C., Migliaccio, A. A., Clendaniel, R. A., Allak, A., & Carey, J. P. (2008). Mechanism of dynamic visual acuity recovery with vestibular rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 89(3), 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.010
Schubert, Michael C., Americo A. Migliaccio, Richard A. Clendaniel, Amir Allak, and John P. Carey. “Mechanism of dynamic visual acuity recovery with vestibular rehabilitation.Arch Phys Med Rehabil 89, no. 3 (March 2008): 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.010.
Schubert MC, Migliaccio AA, Clendaniel RA, Allak A, Carey JP. Mechanism of dynamic visual acuity recovery with vestibular rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Mar;89(3):500–7.
Schubert, Michael C., et al. “Mechanism of dynamic visual acuity recovery with vestibular rehabilitation.Arch Phys Med Rehabil, vol. 89, no. 3, Mar. 2008, pp. 500–07. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.010.
Schubert MC, Migliaccio AA, Clendaniel RA, Allak A, Carey JP. Mechanism of dynamic visual acuity recovery with vestibular rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Mar;89(3):500–507.
Journal cover image

Published In

Arch Phys Med Rehabil

DOI

EISSN

1532-821X

Publication Date

March 2008

Volume

89

Issue

3

Start / End Page

500 / 507

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Visual Acuity
  • Vestibular Function Tests
  • Vestibular Diseases
  • Vertigo
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Risk Assessment
  • Rehabilitation
  • Reflex, Vestibulo-Ocular
  • Reference Values