Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Gas trapping with high-frequency ventilation: jet versus oscillatory ventilation.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Bancalari, A; Gerhardt, T; Bancalari, E; Suguihara, C; Hehre, D; Reifenberg, L; Goldberg, RN
Published in: J Pediatr
April 1987

Gas trapping was evaluated during high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) and high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) in nine adult rabbits under basal conditions and after instillation of a mixture of 20% human meconium (2 mL/kg). The anesthetized animals underwent tracheostomy and were placed inside a body plethysmograph. Respiratory compliance and resistance were calculated from airway pressure and simultaneous flow, and volume was measured with a pneumotachograph. Gas trapping was measured as the change in volume observed in the plethysmograph after clamping the jet or the oscillatory line at respiratory rates of 10 and 15 Hz and tidal volumes of 1.0 and 2.0 mL/kg. Mean airway pressure was similar with both ventilators. Inspiratory/expiratory ratios were 1:4 at 10 Hz and 1:2 at 15 Hz with HFJV, and 1:1 during HFOV. Under all conditions, gas trapping was significantly greater with HFJV than with HFOV. More gas trapping was observed with higher tidal volume (2 mL/kg) and respiratory rate (15 Hz) during HFJV, before and after meconium instillation. After meconium instillation, gas trapping during HFJV at 15 Hz and tidal volume 2 mL/kg decreased significantly (32.7 +/- 10.4 to 24.9 +/- 10.3; P less than 0.05), compared with basal conditions. This finding may be explained by the shorter time constant of the respiratory system after meconium instillation (0.118 vs 0.083 seconds, P less than 0.01). Thus gas trapping was significantly greater with HFJV than with HFOV, a difference most likely related to the active expiratory phase of HFOV.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Pediatr

DOI

ISSN

0022-3476

Publication Date

April 1987

Volume

110

Issue

4

Start / End Page

617 / 622

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Ventilators, Mechanical
  • Tidal Volume
  • Rabbits
  • Pediatrics
  • Lung Compliance
  • Infant, Newborn, Diseases
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Humans
  • Gases
  • Animals
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Bancalari, A., Gerhardt, T., Bancalari, E., Suguihara, C., Hehre, D., Reifenberg, L., & Goldberg, R. N. (1987). Gas trapping with high-frequency ventilation: jet versus oscillatory ventilation. J Pediatr, 110(4), 617–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3476(87)80563-2
Bancalari, A., T. Gerhardt, E. Bancalari, C. Suguihara, D. Hehre, L. Reifenberg, and R. N. Goldberg. “Gas trapping with high-frequency ventilation: jet versus oscillatory ventilation.J Pediatr 110, no. 4 (April 1987): 617–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3476(87)80563-2.
Bancalari A, Gerhardt T, Bancalari E, Suguihara C, Hehre D, Reifenberg L, et al. Gas trapping with high-frequency ventilation: jet versus oscillatory ventilation. J Pediatr. 1987 Apr;110(4):617–22.
Bancalari, A., et al. “Gas trapping with high-frequency ventilation: jet versus oscillatory ventilation.J Pediatr, vol. 110, no. 4, Apr. 1987, pp. 617–22. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/s0022-3476(87)80563-2.
Bancalari A, Gerhardt T, Bancalari E, Suguihara C, Hehre D, Reifenberg L, Goldberg RN. Gas trapping with high-frequency ventilation: jet versus oscillatory ventilation. J Pediatr. 1987 Apr;110(4):617–622.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Pediatr

DOI

ISSN

0022-3476

Publication Date

April 1987

Volume

110

Issue

4

Start / End Page

617 / 622

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Ventilators, Mechanical
  • Tidal Volume
  • Rabbits
  • Pediatrics
  • Lung Compliance
  • Infant, Newborn, Diseases
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Humans
  • Gases
  • Animals