Monitoring visual status: why patients do or do not comply with practice guidelines.

Published

Journal Article

To determine factors affecting compliance with guidelines for annual eye examinations for persons diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (DM) or age-related macular degeneration (ARMD).Nationally representative, longitudinal sample of individuals 65+ drawn from the National Long-Term Care Survey (NLTCS) with linked Medicare claims records from 1991 to 1999.Medicare beneficiaries were followed from 1991 to 1999, unless mortality intervened. All claims data were analyzed for presence of ICD-9 codes indicating diagnosis of DM or ARMD and the performance of eye exams. The dependent variable was a binary indicator for whether a person had an eye exam or not during a 15-month period. Independent variables for demographics, living conditions, supplemental insurance, income, and other factors affecting the marginal cost and benefit of an eye exam were assessed to determine reasons for noncompliance.Panel data were created from claims files, 1991-1999, merged with data from the NLTCS.The probability of having an exam reflected perceived benefits, which vary by patient characteristics (e.g., education, no dementia), and factors associated with the ease of visit. African Americans were much less likely to be examined than were whites.Having an exam reflects multiple factors. However, much of the variation in the probability of an exam remained unexplained as were reasons for the racial differences in use.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Sloan, FA; Brown, DS; Carlisle, ES; Picone, GA; Lee, PP

Published Date

  • October 2004

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 39 / 5

Start / End Page

  • 1429 - 1448

PubMed ID

  • 15333116

Pubmed Central ID

  • 15333116

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1475-6773

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

  • 0017-9124

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00297.x

Language

  • eng