Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Double-blind randomized study comparing brand-name and generic phenytoin monotherapy.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Mikati, M; Bassett, N; Schachter, S
Published in: Epilepsia
1992

Ten patients with well-controlled seizures receiving chronic phenytoin (PHT) monotherapy for seizure prophylaxis completed a randomized double-blind crossover study comparing brand-name and generic PHT. Each patient received the same dose of each preparation for 3 months during which trough PHT concentrations and adverse effects were monitored. The average predose steady-state total PHT concentration was 11.9 +/- 4.9 micrograms/ml during brand-name therapy and 14.2 +/- 8.2 micrograms/ml during generic therapy. The average predose steady-state free PHT concentrations were 0.93 +/- 0.47 micrograms/ml (brand name) and 1.14 +/- 0.64 micrograms/ml (generic), respectively (p less than 0.005). The potency (capsule content) values for the lots used in the study were 99.2% for the brand-name and 104.6% for generic. Because of the nonlinear Michaelis-Menten kinetics of PHT, a 5.4% difference in potency could account for the observed differences in plasma concentrations. When compared with brand-name PHT therapy, the generic drug was associated with an increase in serum concentration. This increase was consistent with the reported difference in capsule content between the generic and brand-name lots used in this study.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Epilepsia

DOI

ISSN

0013-9580

Publication Date

1992

Volume

33

Issue

2

Start / End Page

359 / 365

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Therapeutic Equivalency
  • Placebos
  • Phenytoin
  • Patient Dropouts
  • Neurology & Neurosurgery
  • Humans
  • Epilepsy
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Capsules
  • Administration, Oral
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Mikati, M., Bassett, N., & Schachter, S. (1992). Double-blind randomized study comparing brand-name and generic phenytoin monotherapy. Epilepsia, 33(2), 359–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1157.1992.tb02328.x
Mikati, M., N. Bassett, and S. Schachter. “Double-blind randomized study comparing brand-name and generic phenytoin monotherapy.Epilepsia 33, no. 2 (1992): 359–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1157.1992.tb02328.x.
Mikati M, Bassett N, Schachter S. Double-blind randomized study comparing brand-name and generic phenytoin monotherapy. Epilepsia. 1992;33(2):359–65.
Mikati, M., et al. “Double-blind randomized study comparing brand-name and generic phenytoin monotherapy.Epilepsia, vol. 33, no. 2, 1992, pp. 359–65. Pubmed, doi:10.1111/j.1528-1157.1992.tb02328.x.
Mikati M, Bassett N, Schachter S. Double-blind randomized study comparing brand-name and generic phenytoin monotherapy. Epilepsia. 1992;33(2):359–365.
Journal cover image

Published In

Epilepsia

DOI

ISSN

0013-9580

Publication Date

1992

Volume

33

Issue

2

Start / End Page

359 / 365

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Therapeutic Equivalency
  • Placebos
  • Phenytoin
  • Patient Dropouts
  • Neurology & Neurosurgery
  • Humans
  • Epilepsy
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Capsules
  • Administration, Oral