Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Likelihood ratios for continuous test results--making the clinicians' job easier or harder?

Publication ,  Journal Article
Simel, DL; Samsa, GP; Matchar, DB
Published in: J Clin Epidemiol
January 1993

Clinicians' paradigms for considering diagnostic test results require decisions based on the actual test value. However, when the test result is reported on a continuous scale each possible outcome may not result in unique actions. To simplify decision making, clinicians often break down the continuous scale into dichotomous or ordered outcomes. Likelihood ratios, reported with the test outcome, help summarize the impact of diagnostic tests. Although commonly applied to dichotomous outcomes, likelihood ratios can also be applied to ordinal or continuous results. This application allows investigators to consider the effect of clinically simplifying continuous data into dichotomous or ordinal categories. The parameters of a simple logistic regression equation summarize continuous likelihood ratios, evaluate covariates, generate likelihood ratio lines, and help assess the statistical significance of more complex models. Having visually inspected likelihood ratio lines and considered statistical differences, the investigator should choose the test report format that best accounts the realities driving clinical decisions.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Clin Epidemiol

DOI

ISSN

0895-4356

Publication Date

January 1993

Volume

46

Issue

1

Start / End Page

85 / 93

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Odds Ratio
  • Mathematics
  • Logistic Models
  • Humans
  • Epidemiology
  • Diagnosis
  • 4202 Epidemiology
  • 11 Medical and Health Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Simel, D. L., Samsa, G. P., & Matchar, D. B. (1993). Likelihood ratios for continuous test results--making the clinicians' job easier or harder? J Clin Epidemiol, 46(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(93)90012-p
Simel, D. L., G. P. Samsa, and D. B. Matchar. “Likelihood ratios for continuous test results--making the clinicians' job easier or harder?J Clin Epidemiol 46, no. 1 (January 1993): 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(93)90012-p.
Simel DL, Samsa GP, Matchar DB. Likelihood ratios for continuous test results--making the clinicians' job easier or harder? J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Jan;46(1):85–93.
Simel, D. L., et al. “Likelihood ratios for continuous test results--making the clinicians' job easier or harder?J Clin Epidemiol, vol. 46, no. 1, Jan. 1993, pp. 85–93. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/0895-4356(93)90012-p.
Simel DL, Samsa GP, Matchar DB. Likelihood ratios for continuous test results--making the clinicians' job easier or harder? J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Jan;46(1):85–93.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Clin Epidemiol

DOI

ISSN

0895-4356

Publication Date

January 1993

Volume

46

Issue

1

Start / End Page

85 / 93

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Odds Ratio
  • Mathematics
  • Logistic Models
  • Humans
  • Epidemiology
  • Diagnosis
  • 4202 Epidemiology
  • 11 Medical and Health Sciences