Skip to main content

Magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiography: quantitative and qualitative comparison of 3.0 Tesla with 1.5 Tesla.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Schindera, ST; Miller, CM; Ho, LM; DeLong, DM; Merkle, EM
Published in: Invest Radiol
June 2007

OBJECTIVES: To determine quantitative and qualitative image quality in patients undergoing magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiography at 3.0 Tesla (T) compared with 1.5 T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients (30 women; mean age, 51 years) underwent MR cholangiography at 1.5 T; another 50 patients (25 women; mean age 51 years) were scanned at 3.0 T. MR sequence protocol consisted of breath-hold single-slice rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE) and a respiratory-triggered 3D turbo spin echo (3D TSE) sequence. Maximum intensity projections were generated from the 3D TSE datasets. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) measurements between the common bile duct (CBD), left and right intrahepatic duct (LHD, RHD), and periductal tissue were performed. Three radiologists assessed qualitatively the visibility of the CBD, LHD, and RHD and the overall diagnostic quality. RESULTS: Mean gain in CNR at 3.0 T versus 1.5 T in all 3 locations ranged for the RARE sequence from 7.7% to 38.1% and for the 3D TSE from 0.5% to 26.1% (P > 0.05 for all differences). Qualitative analysis did not reveal any significant difference between the 2 field strengths (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: MR cholangiography at 3.0 T shows a trend toward higher CNR without improving image quality significantly.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Invest Radiol

DOI

ISSN

0020-9996

Publication Date

June 2007

Volume

42

Issue

6

Start / End Page

399 / 405

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Statistics, Nonparametric
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Pancreatitis
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Imaging, Three-Dimensional
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Cholangiopancreatography, Magnetic Resonance
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Schindera, S. T., Miller, C. M., Ho, L. M., DeLong, D. M., & Merkle, E. M. (2007). Magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiography: quantitative and qualitative comparison of 3.0 Tesla with 1.5 Tesla. Invest Radiol, 42(6), 399–405. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.rli.0000261940.98762.20
Schindera, Sebastian T., Chad M. Miller, Lisa M. Ho, David M. DeLong, and Elmar M. Merkle. “Magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiography: quantitative and qualitative comparison of 3.0 Tesla with 1.5 Tesla.Invest Radiol 42, no. 6 (June 2007): 399–405. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.rli.0000261940.98762.20.
Schindera ST, Miller CM, Ho LM, DeLong DM, Merkle EM. Magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiography: quantitative and qualitative comparison of 3.0 Tesla with 1.5 Tesla. Invest Radiol. 2007 Jun;42(6):399–405.
Schindera, Sebastian T., et al. “Magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiography: quantitative and qualitative comparison of 3.0 Tesla with 1.5 Tesla.Invest Radiol, vol. 42, no. 6, June 2007, pp. 399–405. Pubmed, doi:10.1097/01.rli.0000261940.98762.20.
Schindera ST, Miller CM, Ho LM, DeLong DM, Merkle EM. Magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiography: quantitative and qualitative comparison of 3.0 Tesla with 1.5 Tesla. Invest Radiol. 2007 Jun;42(6):399–405.

Published In

Invest Radiol

DOI

ISSN

0020-9996

Publication Date

June 2007

Volume

42

Issue

6

Start / End Page

399 / 405

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Statistics, Nonparametric
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Pancreatitis
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Imaging, Three-Dimensional
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Cholangiopancreatography, Magnetic Resonance