Skip to main content

Why some women look young for their age.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Gunn, DA; Rexbye, H; Griffiths, CEM; Murray, PG; Fereday, A; Catt, SD; Tomlin, CC; Strongitharm, BH; Perrett, DI; Catt, M; Mayes, AE ...
Published in: PloS one
December 2009

The desire of many to look young for their age has led to the establishment of a large cosmetics industry. However, the features of appearance that primarily determine how old women look for their age and whether genetic or environmental factors predominately influence such features are largely unknown. We studied the facial appearance of 102 pairs of female Danish twins aged 59 to 81 as well as 162 British females aged 45 to 75. Skin wrinkling, hair graying and lip height were significantly and independently associated with how old the women looked for their age. The appearance of facial sun-damage was also found to be significantly correlated to how old women look for their age and was primarily due to its commonality with the appearance of skin wrinkles. There was also considerable variation in the perceived age data that was unaccounted for. Composite facial images created from women who looked young or old for their age indicated that the structure of subcutaneous tissue was partly responsible. Heritability analyses of the appearance features revealed that perceived age, pigmented age spots, skin wrinkles and the appearance of sun-damage were influenced more or less equally by genetic and environmental factors. Hair graying, recession of hair from the forehead and lip height were influenced mainly by genetic factors whereas environmental factors influenced hair thinning. These findings indicate that women who look young for their age have large lips, avoid sun-exposure and possess genetic factors that protect against the development of gray hair and skin wrinkles. The findings also demonstrate that perceived age is a better biomarker of skin, hair and facial aging than chronological age.

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

PloS one

DOI

EISSN

1932-6203

ISSN

1932-6203

Publication Date

December 2009

Volume

4

Issue

12

Start / End Page

e8021

Related Subject Headings

  • United Kingdom
  • Skin Aging
  • Siblings
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Middle Aged
  • Linear Models
  • Inheritance Patterns
  • Humans
  • Hair
  • General Science & Technology
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Gunn, D. A., Rexbye, H., Griffiths, C. E. M., Murray, P. G., Fereday, A., Catt, S. D., … Christensen, K. (2009). Why some women look young for their age. PloS One, 4(12), e8021. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008021
Gunn, David A., Helle Rexbye, Christopher E. M. Griffiths, Peter G. Murray, Amelia Fereday, Sharon D. Catt, Cyrena C. Tomlin, et al. “Why some women look young for their age.PloS One 4, no. 12 (December 2009): e8021. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008021.
Gunn DA, Rexbye H, Griffiths CEM, Murray PG, Fereday A, Catt SD, et al. Why some women look young for their age. PloS one. 2009 Dec;4(12):e8021.
Gunn, David A., et al. “Why some women look young for their age.PloS One, vol. 4, no. 12, Dec. 2009, p. e8021. Epmc, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008021.
Gunn DA, Rexbye H, Griffiths CEM, Murray PG, Fereday A, Catt SD, Tomlin CC, Strongitharm BH, Perrett DI, Catt M, Mayes AE, Messenger AG, Green MR, van der Ouderaa F, Vaupel JW, Christensen K. Why some women look young for their age. PloS one. 2009 Dec;4(12):e8021.

Published In

PloS one

DOI

EISSN

1932-6203

ISSN

1932-6203

Publication Date

December 2009

Volume

4

Issue

12

Start / End Page

e8021

Related Subject Headings

  • United Kingdom
  • Skin Aging
  • Siblings
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Middle Aged
  • Linear Models
  • Inheritance Patterns
  • Humans
  • Hair
  • General Science & Technology