Measurement of chemoresistance markers in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer: a novel approach for patient selection.

Journal Article

BACKGROUND: The long-term survival of patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer treated with a combination of chemotherapy and radiation is 10% to 20%. Survival could potentially be increased and toxicity limited if one could identify patients most likely to respond to a particular treatment regimen. This project prospectively evaluated a panel of potential immunohistochemical markers of chemoresistance in a population of patients with pathology-confirmed stage III non-small cell lung cancer in order to determine the prognostic value of each marker in relation to response to chemotherapy or survival. METHODS: Immunohistochemical staining was performed on histologically positive mediastinal nodal specimens obtained from 59 patients (mean age, 62 years; range, 41 to 79 years) without evidence of distant metastatic disease treated with navelbine-based chemotherapy and external beam radiation therapy between 1996 and 2001. Included were markers for apoptosis (p53, bcl-2), drug efflux/degradation (MDR, GST-pi), growth factors (EGFr, Her2-neu), and mismatch repair (hMLH1, hMSH2). After chemotherapy, patients underwent radiologic evaluation for response measured by standard criteria. RESULTS: After a median 41 months of follow-up (range, 17 to 55 months), 43 patients had recurrent disease and 38 of these patients were dead of cancer (median cancer-free survival of 10 months and overall survival of 18 months). Patients who demonstrated a complete or partial response (n = 38) had a significantly improved survival (p = 0.002) compared with those with stable or progressive cancer (n = 21). Multivariable Cox step-wise regression analysis of marker expression associated overexpression of p53 and low expression of hMSH2 with poor treatment response and cancer death. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary data suggest that marker expression may allow the separation of patients into low- and high-risk groups with respect to survival after combined navelbine-based chemotherapy and XRT. This could represent a novel method of selecting patients for a particular treatment regimen if these data are reproduced in a larger prospective trial.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Brooks, KR; To, K; Joshi, M-BM; Conlon, DH; Herndon, JE; D'Amico, TA; Harpole, DH

Published Date

  • July 2003

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 76 / 1

Start / End Page

  • 187 - 193

PubMed ID

  • 12842538

Pubmed Central ID

  • 12842538

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

  • 0003-4975

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/s0003-4975(03)00131-0


  • eng

Conference Location

  • Netherlands