A clinical prediction tool to estimate the number of units of red blood cells needed in primary elective coronary artery bypass surgery.

Journal Article

BACKGROUND: Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is common during cardiac surgical procedures. Empiric crossmatching, without attempting to estimate individual transfusion requirements is typical. We hypothesized that a clinical prediction tool could be developed to estimate the number of units of RBCs needed for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: With institutional review board approval, detailed demographic, risk factor, and transfusion data of primary elective CABG procedures (n=5887) from September 1, 1993, to June 20, 2002, were studied and the data set was divided into development and validation subgroups. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression was used to develop and validate transfusion risk factors, assign them a relative weight, and create a model to stratify patients into groups depending on predicted need for 0, 2, 4, or more than 4 RBC units. The model was compared with current standard practice of crossmatching 4 RBC units in terms of observed blood product usage over the study period. RESULTS: Demographic and transfusion risk factor variables in the development (n=3876) and validation (n=2011) data sets were similar. The predictive value of the model was good for the development and validation groups, with a c-index of 0.79 and 0.78, respectively. Applying the predictive model reduced the number of crossmatches by 30% without underproviding RBC units and increased the percentage of patients crossmatched exactly for the required number of units from 11% to 21%. CONCLUSIONS: Predictive factors for RBC transfusion were identified and used to construct a clinical tool to conserve blood bank resources without increasing patient risk.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Welsby, I; Crow, J; Bandarenko, N; Lappas, G; Phillips-Bute, B; Stafford-Smith, M

Published Date

  • November 2010

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 50 / 11

Start / End Page

  • 2337 - 2343

PubMed ID

  • 20529005

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1537-2995

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02711.x

Language

  • eng

Conference Location

  • United States