Emotion and reliability in moral psychology
Publication
, Journal Article
Sinnott-Armstrong, W
Published in: Emotion Review
January 1, 2011
Instead of arguing about whether moral judgments are based on emotion or reason, moral psychologists should investigate the reliability of moral judgments by checking rates of framing effects in different kinds of moral judgments under different conditions by different people. © The Author(s) 2011.
Duke Scholars
Published In
Emotion Review
DOI
ISSN
1754-0739
Publication Date
January 1, 2011
Volume
3
Issue
3
Start / End Page
288 / 289
Related Subject Headings
- 2203 Philosophy
- 1702 Cognitive Sciences
- 1701 Psychology
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2011). Emotion and reliability in moral psychology. Emotion Review, 3(3), 288–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073911402382
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. “Emotion and reliability in moral psychology.” Emotion Review 3, no. 3 (January 1, 2011): 288–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073911402382.
Sinnott-Armstrong W. Emotion and reliability in moral psychology. Emotion Review. 2011 Jan 1;3(3):288–9.
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. “Emotion and reliability in moral psychology.” Emotion Review, vol. 3, no. 3, Jan. 2011, pp. 288–89. Scopus, doi:10.1177/1754073911402382.
Sinnott-Armstrong W. Emotion and reliability in moral psychology. Emotion Review. 2011 Jan 1;3(3):288–289.
Published In
Emotion Review
DOI
ISSN
1754-0739
Publication Date
January 1, 2011
Volume
3
Issue
3
Start / End Page
288 / 289
Related Subject Headings
- 2203 Philosophy
- 1702 Cognitive Sciences
- 1701 Psychology