Quality of colonoscopy reporting in community practice.


Journal Article

BACKGROUND: Quality endoscopy reporting is essential when community endoscopists perform colonoscopies for veterans who cannot be scheduled at a Veterans Administration (VA) facility. OBJECTIVE: To examine the quality of colonoscopy reports received from community practices and to determine factors associated with more complete reporting, by using national documentation guidelines. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis. SETTING: Reports submitted to the Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, from 2007 to 2008. PATIENTS: Subjects who underwent fee-basis colonoscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Scores created by comparing community reports with published documentation guidelines. Three scores were created, one for each category of information: Universal Elements (found on all endoscopy reports), Indication Elements (specific to the procedure indication), and Finding Elements (specific to examination findings). RESULTS: For the 135 included reports, the summary scores were Universal Elements, 57.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 55%-60%); Indication Elements, 73.7% (95% CI, 69%-78%); and Finding Elements, 75.8% (95% CI, 73%-79%). Examples of poor reporting included patient history (20.7%), last colonoscopy date (18.0%), average versus high risk screening (32.0%), withdrawal time (5.9%), and cecal landmark photographs (45.2%). Only the use of automated reporting software was associated with more thorough reporting. LIMITATIONS: Modest sample size, mostly male participants, frequent pathologic findings, limited geography, and lack of complete reporting by a minority of providers. CONCLUSIONS: The overall completeness of colonoscopy reports was low, possibly reflecting a lack of knowledge of reporting guidelines or a lack of agreement regarding important colonoscopy reporting elements. Automated endoscopy software may improve reporting compliance but may not completely standardize reporting quality.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Palmer, LB; Abbott, DH; Hamilton, N; Provenzale, D; Fisher, DA

Published Date

  • August 2010

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 72 / 2

Start / End Page

  • 321 - 327.e1

PubMed ID

  • 20591430

Pubmed Central ID

  • 20591430

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1097-6779

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.gie.2010.03.002


  • eng

Conference Location

  • United States