Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Biosensibility of viability: NOGA or no good?

Publication ,  Journal Article
Mayes, CE; Bashore, TM
Published in: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
March 2001

Duke Scholars

Published In

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv

DOI

ISSN

1522-1946

Publication Date

March 2001

Volume

52

Issue

3

Start / End Page

348 / 350

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Ventricular Function, Left
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Myocardial Infarction
  • Myocardial Contraction
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
  • Humans
  • Electrocardiography
  • Echocardiography
  • Coronary Disease
  • Cardiovascular System & Hematology
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Mayes, C. E., & Bashore, T. M. (2001). Biosensibility of viability: NOGA or no good? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 52(3), 348–350. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.1079
Mayes, C. E., and T. M. Bashore. “Biosensibility of viability: NOGA or no good?Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 52, no. 3 (March 2001): 348–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.1079.
Mayes CE, Bashore TM. Biosensibility of viability: NOGA or no good? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2001 Mar;52(3):348–50.
Mayes, C. E., and T. M. Bashore. “Biosensibility of viability: NOGA or no good?Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, vol. 52, no. 3, Mar. 2001, pp. 348–50. Pubmed, doi:10.1002/ccd.1079.
Mayes CE, Bashore TM. Biosensibility of viability: NOGA or no good? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2001 Mar;52(3):348–350.
Journal cover image

Published In

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv

DOI

ISSN

1522-1946

Publication Date

March 2001

Volume

52

Issue

3

Start / End Page

348 / 350

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Ventricular Function, Left
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Myocardial Infarction
  • Myocardial Contraction
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
  • Humans
  • Electrocardiography
  • Echocardiography
  • Coronary Disease
  • Cardiovascular System & Hematology