Biosensibility of viability: NOGA or no good?
Publication
, Journal Article
Mayes, CE; Bashore, TM
Published in: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
March 2001
Duke Scholars
Published In
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
DOI
ISSN
1522-1946
Publication Date
March 2001
Volume
52
Issue
3
Start / End Page
348 / 350
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- Ventricular Function, Left
- Predictive Value of Tests
- Myocardial Infarction
- Myocardial Contraction
- Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
- Humans
- Electrocardiography
- Echocardiography
- Coronary Disease
- Cardiovascular System & Hematology
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Mayes, C. E., & Bashore, T. M. (2001). Biosensibility of viability: NOGA or no good? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 52(3), 348–350. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.1079
Mayes, C. E., and T. M. Bashore. “Biosensibility of viability: NOGA or no good?” Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 52, no. 3 (March 2001): 348–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.1079.
Mayes CE, Bashore TM. Biosensibility of viability: NOGA or no good? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2001 Mar;52(3):348–50.
Mayes, C. E., and T. M. Bashore. “Biosensibility of viability: NOGA or no good?” Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, vol. 52, no. 3, Mar. 2001, pp. 348–50. Pubmed, doi:10.1002/ccd.1079.
Mayes CE, Bashore TM. Biosensibility of viability: NOGA or no good? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2001 Mar;52(3):348–350.
Published In
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
DOI
ISSN
1522-1946
Publication Date
March 2001
Volume
52
Issue
3
Start / End Page
348 / 350
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- Ventricular Function, Left
- Predictive Value of Tests
- Myocardial Infarction
- Myocardial Contraction
- Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
- Humans
- Electrocardiography
- Echocardiography
- Coronary Disease
- Cardiovascular System & Hematology