Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Does prospective payment reduce inpatient length of stay?

Publication ,  Journal Article
Norton, EC; Van Houtven, CH; Lindrooth, RC; Normand, S-LT; Dickey, B
Published in: Health Econ
July 2002

A change in payment mechanism for inpatient care from per diem to per episode creates two incentives - a marginal and an average price effect - to change length of stay. The decrease in marginal price per day to zero should reduce the length of stay, while an increase in average price per inpatient stay should increase the length of stay. This study uses data from a natural experiment to estimate both marginal and average price elasticities, and to test whether the length of stay falls after the introduction of prospective payment in a sample of 8509 severely mentally ill patients. We estimate that the marginal price elasticity is zero, but the average price elasticity is between 0.16 and 0.20. The results were generally robust for short- and long stayers, and for persons admitted early and late after the change in payment mechanism. The model controlled for hospital fixed effects and individual random effects.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Health Econ

DOI

ISSN

1057-9230

Publication Date

July 2002

Volume

11

Issue

5

Start / End Page

377 / 387

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Reimbursement, Incentive
  • Quality Assurance, Health Care
  • Psychiatric Department, Hospital
  • Prospective Payment System
  • Models, Econometric
  • Middle Aged
  • Mental Disorders
  • Medicaid
  • Massachusetts
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Norton, E. C., Van Houtven, C. H., Lindrooth, R. C., Normand, S.-L., & Dickey, B. (2002). Does prospective payment reduce inpatient length of stay? Health Econ, 11(5), 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.675
Norton, Edward C., Courtney Harold Van Houtven, Richard C. Lindrooth, Sharon-Lise T. Normand, and Barbara Dickey. “Does prospective payment reduce inpatient length of stay?Health Econ 11, no. 5 (July 2002): 377–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.675.
Norton EC, Van Houtven CH, Lindrooth RC, Normand S-LT, Dickey B. Does prospective payment reduce inpatient length of stay? Health Econ. 2002 Jul;11(5):377–87.
Norton, Edward C., et al. “Does prospective payment reduce inpatient length of stay?Health Econ, vol. 11, no. 5, July 2002, pp. 377–87. Pubmed, doi:10.1002/hec.675.
Norton EC, Van Houtven CH, Lindrooth RC, Normand S-LT, Dickey B. Does prospective payment reduce inpatient length of stay? Health Econ. 2002 Jul;11(5):377–387.
Journal cover image

Published In

Health Econ

DOI

ISSN

1057-9230

Publication Date

July 2002

Volume

11

Issue

5

Start / End Page

377 / 387

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Reimbursement, Incentive
  • Quality Assurance, Health Care
  • Psychiatric Department, Hospital
  • Prospective Payment System
  • Models, Econometric
  • Middle Aged
  • Mental Disorders
  • Medicaid
  • Massachusetts