Skip to main content

Economic assessment of low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) versus unfractionated heparin in acute coronary syndrome patients: results from the ESSENCE randomized trial. Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non-Q wave Coronary Events [unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction].

Publication ,  Journal Article
Mark, DB; Cowper, PA; Berkowitz, SD; Davidson-Ray, L; DeLong, ER; Turpie, AG; Califf, RM; Weatherley, B; Cohen, M
Published in: Circulation
May 5, 1998

BACKGROUND: In the ESSENCE trial, subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) reduced the 30-day incidence of death, myocardial infarction, and recurrent angina relative to intravenous unfractionated heparin in 3171 patients with acute coronary syndrome (unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction). No increase in major bleeding was seen. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of the 936 ESSENCE patients randomized in the United States, 655 had hospital billing data collected. For the remainder, hospital costs were imputed with a multivariable linear regression model (R2=.86). Physician fees were estimated from the Medicare Fee Schedule. During the initial hospitalization, major resource use was reduced for enoxaparin patients, with the largest effect seen with coronary angioplasty (15% versus 20% for heparin, P=.04). At 30 days, these effects persisted, with the largest reductions seen in diagnostic catheterization (57% versus 63% for heparin, P=.04) and coronary angioplasty (18% versus 22%, P=.08). All resource use trends seen in the US cohort were also evident in the overall ESSENCE study population. In the United States, the mean cost of a course of enoxaparin therapy was $155, whereas that for heparin was $80. The total medical costs (hospital, physician, drug) for the initial hospitalization were $11 857 for enoxaparin and $12620 for heparin, a cost advantage for the enoxaparin arm of $763 (P=.18). At the end of 30 days, the cumulative cost savings associated with enoxaparin was $1172 (P=.04). In 200 bootstrap samples of the 30-day data, 94% of the samples showed a cost advantage for enoxaparin. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute coronary syndrome, low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) both improves important clinical outcomes and saves money relative to therapy with standard unfractionated heparin.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Circulation

DOI

ISSN

0009-7322

Publication Date

May 5, 1998

Volume

97

Issue

17

Start / End Page

1702 / 1707

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Heparin
  • Health Care Costs
  • Female
  • Enoxaparin
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Coronary Disease
  • Cardiovascular System & Hematology
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Mark, D. B., P. A. Cowper, S. D. Berkowitz, L. Davidson-Ray, E. R. DeLong, A. G. Turpie, R. M. Califf, B. Weatherley, and M. Cohen. “Economic assessment of low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) versus unfractionated heparin in acute coronary syndrome patients: results from the ESSENCE randomized trial. Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non-Q wave Coronary Events [unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction].Circulation 97, no. 17 (May 5, 1998): 1702–7. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.97.17.1702.

Published In

Circulation

DOI

ISSN

0009-7322

Publication Date

May 5, 1998

Volume

97

Issue

17

Start / End Page

1702 / 1707

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Heparin
  • Health Care Costs
  • Female
  • Enoxaparin
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Coronary Disease
  • Cardiovascular System & Hematology