Skip to main content

Discordance of databases designed for claims payment versus clinical information systems. Implications for outcomes research.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Jollis, JG; Ancukiewicz, M; DeLong, ER; Pryor, DB; Muhlbaier, LH; Mark, DB
Published in: Ann Intern Med
October 15, 1993

OBJECTIVE: To determine the suitability of insurance claims information for use in clinical outcomes research in ischemic heart disease. DESIGN: Concordance study of two databases. SETTING: Tertiary care referral center. PATIENTS: A total of 12,937 consecutive patients hospitalized for cardiac catheterization for suspected ischemic heart disease between July 1985 and May 1990. INTERVENTIONS: Two-by-two tables were used to compute overall and kappa measures of agreement comparing clinical versus claims data for 12 important predictors of prognosis in patients with ischemic heart disease. MEASUREMENTS: Kappa statistics (agreement adjusted for chance agreement) were used to quantify agreement rates. RESULTS: Agreement rates between the clinical and claims databases ranged from 0.83 for the diagnosis of diabetes to 0.09 for the diagnosis of unstable angina (kappa values). Claims data failed to identify more than one half of the patients with prognostically important conditions, including mitral insufficiency, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, old myocardial infarction, hyperlipidemia, cerebrovascular disease, tobacco use, angina, and unstable angina, when compared with the clinical information system. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that insurance claims data lack important diagnostic and prognostic information when compared with concurrently collected clinical data in the study of ischemic heart disease. Thus, insurance claims data are not as useful as clinical data for identifying clinically relevant patient groups and for adjusting for risk in outcome studies, such as analyses of hospital mortality.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Ann Intern Med

DOI

ISSN

0003-4819

Publication Date

October 15, 1993

Volume

119

Issue

8

Start / End Page

844 / 850

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Research Design
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care
  • North Carolina
  • Insurance Claim Reporting
  • Humans
  • Hospitalization
  • Hospital Information Systems
  • General & Internal Medicine
  • Databases, Factual
  • Coronary Disease
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Jollis, J. G., Ancukiewicz, M., DeLong, E. R., Pryor, D. B., Muhlbaier, L. H., & Mark, D. B. (1993). Discordance of databases designed for claims payment versus clinical information systems. Implications for outcomes research. Ann Intern Med, 119(8), 844–850. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-119-8-199310150-00011
Jollis, J. G., M. Ancukiewicz, E. R. DeLong, D. B. Pryor, L. H. Muhlbaier, and D. B. Mark. “Discordance of databases designed for claims payment versus clinical information systems. Implications for outcomes research.Ann Intern Med 119, no. 8 (October 15, 1993): 844–50. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-119-8-199310150-00011.
Jollis JG, Ancukiewicz M, DeLong ER, Pryor DB, Muhlbaier LH, Mark DB. Discordance of databases designed for claims payment versus clinical information systems. Implications for outcomes research. Ann Intern Med. 1993 Oct 15;119(8):844–50.
Jollis, J. G., et al. “Discordance of databases designed for claims payment versus clinical information systems. Implications for outcomes research.Ann Intern Med, vol. 119, no. 8, Oct. 1993, pp. 844–50. Pubmed, doi:10.7326/0003-4819-119-8-199310150-00011.
Jollis JG, Ancukiewicz M, DeLong ER, Pryor DB, Muhlbaier LH, Mark DB. Discordance of databases designed for claims payment versus clinical information systems. Implications for outcomes research. Ann Intern Med. 1993 Oct 15;119(8):844–850.

Published In

Ann Intern Med

DOI

ISSN

0003-4819

Publication Date

October 15, 1993

Volume

119

Issue

8

Start / End Page

844 / 850

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Research Design
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care
  • North Carolina
  • Insurance Claim Reporting
  • Humans
  • Hospitalization
  • Hospital Information Systems
  • General & Internal Medicine
  • Databases, Factual
  • Coronary Disease