Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Norby, RJ; Delucia, EH; Gielen, B; Calfapietra, C; Giardina, CP; King, JS; Ledford, J; McCarthy, HR; Moore, DJP; Ceulemans, R; De Angelis, P ...
Published in: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
December 2005

Climate change predictions derived from coupled carbon-climate models are highly dependent on assumptions about feedbacks between the biosphere and atmosphere. One critical feedback occurs if C uptake by the biosphere increases in response to the fossil-fuel driven increase in atmospheric [CO(2)] ("CO(2) fertilization"), thereby slowing the rate of increase in atmospheric [CO(2)]. Carbon exchanges between the terrestrial biosphere and atmosphere are often first represented in models as net primary productivity (NPP). However, the contribution of CO(2) fertilization to the future global C cycle has been uncertain, especially in forest ecosystems that dominate global NPP, and models that include a feedback between terrestrial biosphere metabolism and atmospheric [CO(2)] are poorly constrained by experimental evidence. We analyzed the response of NPP to elevated CO(2) ( approximately 550 ppm) in four free-air CO(2) enrichment experiments in forest stands. We show that the response of forest NPP to elevated [CO(2)] is highly conserved across a broad range of productivity, with a stimulation at the median of 23 +/- 2%. At low leaf area indices, a large portion of the response was attributable to increased light absorption, but as leaf area indices increased, the response to elevated [CO(2)] was wholly caused by increased light-use efficiency. The surprising consistency of response across diverse sites provides a benchmark to evaluate predictions of ecosystem and global models and allows us now to focus on unresolved questions about carbon partitioning and retention, and spatial variation in NPP response caused by availability of other growth limiting resources.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

DOI

EISSN

1091-6490

ISSN

0027-8424

Publication Date

December 2005

Volume

102

Issue

50

Start / End Page

18052 / 18056

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Trees
  • Time Factors
  • Regression Analysis
  • Plant Leaves
  • Models, Theoretical
  • Light
  • Italy
  • Climate
  • Carbon Dioxide
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Norby, R. J., Delucia, E. H., Gielen, B., Calfapietra, C., Giardina, C. P., King, J. S., … Oren, R. (2005). Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(50), 18052–18056. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0509478102
Norby, Richard J., Evan H. Delucia, Birgit Gielen, Carlo Calfapietra, Christian P. Giardina, John S. King, Joanne Ledford, et al. “Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102, no. 50 (December 2005): 18052–56. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0509478102.
Norby RJ, Delucia EH, Gielen B, Calfapietra C, Giardina CP, King JS, et al. Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005 Dec;102(50):18052–6.
Norby, Richard J., et al. “Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 50, Dec. 2005, pp. 18052–56. Epmc, doi:10.1073/pnas.0509478102.
Norby RJ, Delucia EH, Gielen B, Calfapietra C, Giardina CP, King JS, Ledford J, McCarthy HR, Moore DJP, Ceulemans R, De Angelis P, Finzi AC, Karnosky DF, Kubiske ME, Lukac M, Pregitzer KS, Scarascia-Mugnozza GE, Schlesinger WH, Oren R. Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005 Dec;102(50):18052–18056.
Journal cover image

Published In

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

DOI

EISSN

1091-6490

ISSN

0027-8424

Publication Date

December 2005

Volume

102

Issue

50

Start / End Page

18052 / 18056

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Trees
  • Time Factors
  • Regression Analysis
  • Plant Leaves
  • Models, Theoretical
  • Light
  • Italy
  • Climate
  • Carbon Dioxide