Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Comparative study of machine-learning and chemometric tools for analysis of in-vivo high-throughput screening data.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Simmons, K; Kinney, J; Owens, A; Kleier, D; Bloch, K; Argentar, D; Walsh, A; Vaidyanathan, G
Published in: J Chem Inf Model
August 2008

High-throughput screening (HTS) has become a central tool of many pharmaceutical and crop-protection discovery operations. If HTS screening is carried out at the level of the intact organism, as is commonly done in crop protection, this strategy has the potential of uncovering a completely new mechanism of actions. The challenge in running a cost-effective HTS operation is to identify ways in which to improve the overall success rate in discovering new biologically active compounds. To this end, we describe our efforts directed at making full use of the data stream arising from HTS. This paper describes a comparative study in which several machine learning and chemometric methodologies were used to develop classifiers on the same data sets derived from in vivo HTS campaigns and their predictive performances compared in terms of false negative and false positive error profiles.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Chem Inf Model

DOI

ISSN

1549-9596

Publication Date

August 2008

Volume

48

Issue

8

Start / End Page

1663 / 1668

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Neural Networks, Computer
  • Models, Biological
  • Medicinal & Biomolecular Chemistry
  • Drug Evaluation, Preclinical
  • Combinatorial Chemistry Techniques
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • 3407 Theoretical and computational chemistry
  • 3404 Medicinal and biomolecular chemistry
  • 0802 Computation Theory and Mathematics
  • 0307 Theoretical and Computational Chemistry
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Simmons, K., Kinney, J., Owens, A., Kleier, D., Bloch, K., Argentar, D., … Vaidyanathan, G. (2008). Comparative study of machine-learning and chemometric tools for analysis of in-vivo high-throughput screening data. J Chem Inf Model, 48(8), 1663–1668. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci800142d
Simmons, Kirk, John Kinney, Aaron Owens, Dan Kleier, Karen Bloch, Dave Argentar, Alicia Walsh, and Ganesh Vaidyanathan. “Comparative study of machine-learning and chemometric tools for analysis of in-vivo high-throughput screening data.J Chem Inf Model 48, no. 8 (August 2008): 1663–68. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci800142d.
Simmons K, Kinney J, Owens A, Kleier D, Bloch K, Argentar D, et al. Comparative study of machine-learning and chemometric tools for analysis of in-vivo high-throughput screening data. J Chem Inf Model. 2008 Aug;48(8):1663–8.
Simmons, Kirk, et al. “Comparative study of machine-learning and chemometric tools for analysis of in-vivo high-throughput screening data.J Chem Inf Model, vol. 48, no. 8, Aug. 2008, pp. 1663–68. Pubmed, doi:10.1021/ci800142d.
Simmons K, Kinney J, Owens A, Kleier D, Bloch K, Argentar D, Walsh A, Vaidyanathan G. Comparative study of machine-learning and chemometric tools for analysis of in-vivo high-throughput screening data. J Chem Inf Model. 2008 Aug;48(8):1663–1668.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Chem Inf Model

DOI

ISSN

1549-9596

Publication Date

August 2008

Volume

48

Issue

8

Start / End Page

1663 / 1668

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Neural Networks, Computer
  • Models, Biological
  • Medicinal & Biomolecular Chemistry
  • Drug Evaluation, Preclinical
  • Combinatorial Chemistry Techniques
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • 3407 Theoretical and computational chemistry
  • 3404 Medicinal and biomolecular chemistry
  • 0802 Computation Theory and Mathematics
  • 0307 Theoretical and Computational Chemistry