Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Body sizes of animal predators and animal prey in food webs

Publication ,  Journal Article
Cohen, JE; Pimm, SL; Yodzis, P; Saldana, J
Published in: Journal of Animal Ecology
January 1, 1993

In c90% of the feeding links among the animal species with known sizes, a larger predator consumes a smaller prey. Larger predators eat prey with a wider range of body sizes than do smaller predators. The geometric mean predator size increases with the size of prey. The increase in geometric mean predator size is less than proportional to the increase in prey size (ie has a slope less than one on log-log coordinates). The geometric mean sizes of prey and predators increase as the habitat of webs changes from aquatic to terrestrial to coastal to marine. Within each type of habitat, mean prey sizes are always less than mean predator sizes, and prey and predator sizes are always positively correlated. Feeding relations order the metabolic types of organisms from invertebrate to vertebrate ectotherm to vertebrate endotherm. Organisms commonly eat other organisms with the same or lower metabolic type, but (with very rare exceptions) organisms do not eat other organisms with a higher metabolic type. Mean sizes of prey increase as the metabolic type of prey changes from the invertebrate to vertebrate ectotherm to vertebrate endotherm, but the same does not hold true for predators. Prey and predator sizes are positively correlated in links from invertebrate prey to invertebrate predators. In links with other combinations of prey and predator metabolic types, the correlation between prey and predator body sizes is rarely large when it is positive, and in some cases is even negative. Species sizes are roughly log-normally distributed. Body size offers a good interpretation of the ordering of animal species assumed in the cascade model, a stochastic model of food web structure. When body size is taken as the physical interpretation of the ordering assumed in the cascade model, and when the body sizes of different animal species are taken as log-normally distributed, many of the empirical findings can be explained in terms of the cascade model. -from Authors

Duke Scholars

Published In

Journal of Animal Ecology

DOI

ISSN

0021-8790

Publication Date

January 1, 1993

Volume

62

Issue

1

Start / End Page

67 / 78

Related Subject Headings

  • Ecology
  • 3109 Zoology
  • 3103 Ecology
  • 07 Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences
  • 06 Biological Sciences
  • 05 Environmental Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Cohen, J. E., Pimm, S. L., Yodzis, P., & Saldana, J. (1993). Body sizes of animal predators and animal prey in food webs. Journal of Animal Ecology, 62(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.2307/5483
Cohen, J. E., S. L. Pimm, P. Yodzis, and J. Saldana. “Body sizes of animal predators and animal prey in food webs.” Journal of Animal Ecology 62, no. 1 (January 1, 1993): 67–78. https://doi.org/10.2307/5483.
Cohen JE, Pimm SL, Yodzis P, Saldana J. Body sizes of animal predators and animal prey in food webs. Journal of Animal Ecology. 1993 Jan 1;62(1):67–78.
Cohen, J. E., et al. “Body sizes of animal predators and animal prey in food webs.” Journal of Animal Ecology, vol. 62, no. 1, Jan. 1993, pp. 67–78. Scopus, doi:10.2307/5483.
Cohen JE, Pimm SL, Yodzis P, Saldana J. Body sizes of animal predators and animal prey in food webs. Journal of Animal Ecology. 1993 Jan 1;62(1):67–78.
Journal cover image

Published In

Journal of Animal Ecology

DOI

ISSN

0021-8790

Publication Date

January 1, 1993

Volume

62

Issue

1

Start / End Page

67 / 78

Related Subject Headings

  • Ecology
  • 3109 Zoology
  • 3103 Ecology
  • 07 Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences
  • 06 Biological Sciences
  • 05 Environmental Sciences