Third prize: the role of endoscopic nephron-sparing surgery in the management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Journal Article (Clinical Trial;Journal Article)

INTRODUCTION: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UT-UC) is an uncommon disease with pronounced difference in 5-year survival for noninvasive (96%) versus invasive (17%) disease. High survival rate of early disease questioned the accepted norm of using radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for all stages. This review assesses effectiveness of endoscopic management for UT-UC. METHODS: A review of 131 UT-UC patients seen between January 1999 and October 2009 was performed. Demographic, clinicopathologic, and outcomes data were collected and compared between patients initially managed with RNU versus those initially managed with nephron-sparing surgery (NSS). The chi-square or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables and the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables were used. Clinical and pathologic stages of RNU patients were evaluated with chi-square testing, whereas difference in length of stay was detected using linear regression. Recurrence rates were compared using multivariate Cox regression. RESULTS: The two arms had similar distributions of age, sex, frequency of medical comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), and Charlson scores. Mean-adjusted length of stay was 2.1 (95% confidence interval [1.6, 2.5]) and 5.5 days (95% confidence interval [5.3, 6.4]) for the NSS and RNU groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Comparison of clinical and pathologic stages of RNU patients showed a difference (p < 0.001), with under-staging noted in 32%. Men (Hazards Ratio = 2.9 [1.5-5.5], p = 0.001) and NSS patients (hazards ratio [HR] = 3.5 [1.7-7.3], p < 0.001) had threefold increased recurrence risk. CONCLUSION: NSS offered shorter hospital stay but had increased risk of recurrence. Therefore, extreme care should be made to rule out occult invasive tumors preoperatively. Patients being managed endoscopically must be informed of the necessity for close follow-up.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Raymundo, EM; Lipkin, ME; Bañez, LB; Mancini, JG; Zilberman, DE; Preminger, GM; Inman, BA

Published Date

  • March 2011

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 25 / 3

Start / End Page

  • 377 - 384

PubMed ID

  • 21401392

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1557-900X

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1089/end.2010.0276


  • eng

Conference Location

  • United States