Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Comparative efficacy of dronedarone and amiodarone for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Piccini, JP; Hasselblad, V; Peterson, ED; Washam, JB; Califf, RM; Kong, DF
Published in: J Am Coll Cardiol
September 15, 2009

OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of dronedarone versus amiodarone for the prevention of recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF). BACKGROUND: Dronedarone is a noniodinated amiodarone congener developed to maintain sinus rhythm. Few data are available to directly compare the efficacy and safety of dronedarone versus amiodarone. METHODS: We conducted a systematic overview of all randomized controlled trials in which the authors evaluated dronedarone or amiodarone for the prevention of AF. The effect of amiodarone versus dronedarone was summarized by the use of indirect comparison meta-analysis and normal logistic meta-regression models. RESULTS: We identified 4 placebo-controlled trials of dronedarone, 4 placebo-controlled trials of amiodarone, and 1 trial of dronedarone versus amiodarone. By using random-effects modeling, we found that there was a significant estimated reduction in recurrent AF with amiodarone versus placebo (odds ratio [OR]: 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.08 to 0.19) but not dronedarone versus placebo (OR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.33 to 1.87). A normal logistic regression model incorporating all trial evidence found amiodarone superior to dronedarone (OR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.63; p < 0.001) for the prevention of recurrent AF. In contrast, these models also found a trend toward greater all-cause mortality (OR: 1.61; 95% CI: 0.97 to 2.68; p = 0.066) and greater overall adverse events requiring drug discontinuation with amiodarone versus dronedarone (OR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.33 to 2.46; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Dronedarone is less effective than amiodarone for the maintenance of sinus rhythm, but has fewer adverse effects. For every 1,000 patients treated with dronedarone instead of amiodarone, we estimate approximately 228 more recurrences of AF in exchange for 9.6 fewer deaths and 62 fewer adverse events requiring discontinuation of drug.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

J Am Coll Cardiol

DOI

EISSN

1558-3597

Publication Date

September 15, 2009

Volume

54

Issue

12

Start / End Page

1089 / 1095

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Sinoatrial Node
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Humans
  • Heart Rate
  • Electrocardiography
  • Dronedarone
  • Cardiovascular System & Hematology
  • Atrial Fibrillation
  • Anti-Arrhythmia Agents
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Piccini, J. P., Hasselblad, V., Peterson, E. D., Washam, J. B., Califf, R. M., & Kong, D. F. (2009). Comparative efficacy of dronedarone and amiodarone for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol, 54(12), 1089–1095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.085
Piccini, Jonathan P., Vic Hasselblad, Eric D. Peterson, Jeffrey B. Washam, Robert M. Califf, and David F. Kong. “Comparative efficacy of dronedarone and amiodarone for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation.J Am Coll Cardiol 54, no. 12 (September 15, 2009): 1089–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.085.
Piccini JP, Hasselblad V, Peterson ED, Washam JB, Califf RM, Kong DF. Comparative efficacy of dronedarone and amiodarone for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Sep 15;54(12):1089–95.
Piccini, Jonathan P., et al. “Comparative efficacy of dronedarone and amiodarone for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation.J Am Coll Cardiol, vol. 54, no. 12, Sept. 2009, pp. 1089–95. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.085.
Piccini JP, Hasselblad V, Peterson ED, Washam JB, Califf RM, Kong DF. Comparative efficacy of dronedarone and amiodarone for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Sep 15;54(12):1089–1095.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Am Coll Cardiol

DOI

EISSN

1558-3597

Publication Date

September 15, 2009

Volume

54

Issue

12

Start / End Page

1089 / 1095

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Sinoatrial Node
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Humans
  • Heart Rate
  • Electrocardiography
  • Dronedarone
  • Cardiovascular System & Hematology
  • Atrial Fibrillation
  • Anti-Arrhythmia Agents