Skip to main content

A systematic review of the factors affecting accuracy of SUV measurements.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Adams, MC; Turkington, TG; Wilson, JM; Wong, TZ
Published in: AJR Am J Roentgenol
August 2010

OBJECTIVE: There is growing interest in using PET/CT for evaluating early response to therapy in cancer treatment. Although widely available and convenient to use, standardized uptake value (SUV) measurements can be influenced by a variety of biologic and technologic factors. Many of these factors can be addressed with close attention to detail and appropriate quality control. This article will review factors potentially affecting SUV measurements and provide recommendations on ways to minimize when using serial PET to assess early response to therapy. CONCLUSION: Scanner and reconstruction parameters can significantly affect SUV measurements. When using serial SUV measurements to assess early response to therapy, imaging should be performed on the same scanner using the same image acquisition and reconstruction protocols. In addition, attention to detail is required for accurate determination of the administered radiopharmaceutical dose.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

AJR Am J Roentgenol

DOI

EISSN

1546-3141

Publication Date

August 2010

Volume

195

Issue

2

Start / End Page

310 / 320

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Radiopharmaceuticals
  • Positron-Emission Tomography
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Neoplasms
  • Models, Biological
  • Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
  • Image Enhancement
  • Humans
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Adams, M. C., Turkington, T. G., Wilson, J. M., & Wong, T. Z. (2010). A systematic review of the factors affecting accuracy of SUV measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 195(2), 310–320. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.4923
Adams, Michael C., Timothy G. Turkington, Joshua M. Wilson, and Terence Z. Wong. “A systematic review of the factors affecting accuracy of SUV measurements.AJR Am J Roentgenol 195, no. 2 (August 2010): 310–20. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.4923.
Adams MC, Turkington TG, Wilson JM, Wong TZ. A systematic review of the factors affecting accuracy of SUV measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Aug;195(2):310–20.
Adams, Michael C., et al. “A systematic review of the factors affecting accuracy of SUV measurements.AJR Am J Roentgenol, vol. 195, no. 2, Aug. 2010, pp. 310–20. Pubmed, doi:10.2214/AJR.10.4923.
Adams MC, Turkington TG, Wilson JM, Wong TZ. A systematic review of the factors affecting accuracy of SUV measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Aug;195(2):310–320.

Published In

AJR Am J Roentgenol

DOI

EISSN

1546-3141

Publication Date

August 2010

Volume

195

Issue

2

Start / End Page

310 / 320

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Radiopharmaceuticals
  • Positron-Emission Tomography
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Neoplasms
  • Models, Biological
  • Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
  • Image Enhancement
  • Humans