Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Discriminating between latent and active tuberculosis with multiple biomarker responses.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Frahm, M; Goswami, ND; Owzar, K; Hecker, E; Mosher, A; Cadogan, E; Nahid, P; Ferrari, G; Stout, JE
Published in: Tuberculosis (Edinb)
May 2011

We sought to identify biomarker responses to tuberculosis specific antigens which could 1) improve the diagnosis of tuberculosis infection and 2) allow the differentiation of active and latent infections. Seventy subjects with active tuberculosis (N = 12), latent tuberculosis (N = 32), or no evidence of tuberculosis infection (N = 26) were evaluated. We used the Luminex Multiplexed Bead Array platform to simultaneously evaluate 25 biomarkers in the supernatant of whole blood samples following overnight stimulation using the Quantiferon(®) Gold In-Tube kit. We defined the response to stimulation as the difference (within an individual patient) between the response to the pooled tuberculosis antigens and the negative control. IP-10 response was significantly higher in tuberculosis-infected (active or latent) subjects compared to the uninfected group (p < 0.0001). Among the 25 parameters, expression levels of IL-15 and MCP-1 were found to be significantly higher in the active tuberculosis group compared to the latent tuberculosis group (p = 0.0006 and 0.0030, respectively). When combined, IL-15 and MCP-1 accurately identified 83% of active and 88% of latent infections. The combination of IL-15 and MCP-1 responses was accurate in distinguishing persons with active tuberculosis from persons with latent tuberculosis in this study.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Tuberculosis (Edinb)

DOI

EISSN

1873-281X

Publication Date

May 2011

Volume

91

Issue

3

Start / End Page

250 / 256

Location

Scotland

Related Subject Headings

  • Tuberculosis
  • Tuberculin Test
  • Mycobacterium tuberculosis
  • Middle Aged
  • Microbiology
  • Male
  • Latent Tuberculosis
  • Interleukin-15
  • Humans
  • Female
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Frahm, M., Goswami, N. D., Owzar, K., Hecker, E., Mosher, A., Cadogan, E., … Stout, J. E. (2011). Discriminating between latent and active tuberculosis with multiple biomarker responses. Tuberculosis (Edinb), 91(3), 250–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tube.2011.02.006
Frahm, Marc, Neela D. Goswami, Kouros Owzar, Emily Hecker, Ann Mosher, Emily Cadogan, Payam Nahid, Guido Ferrari, and Jason E. Stout. “Discriminating between latent and active tuberculosis with multiple biomarker responses.Tuberculosis (Edinb) 91, no. 3 (May 2011): 250–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tube.2011.02.006.
Frahm M, Goswami ND, Owzar K, Hecker E, Mosher A, Cadogan E, et al. Discriminating between latent and active tuberculosis with multiple biomarker responses. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2011 May;91(3):250–6.
Frahm, Marc, et al. “Discriminating between latent and active tuberculosis with multiple biomarker responses.Tuberculosis (Edinb), vol. 91, no. 3, May 2011, pp. 250–56. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.tube.2011.02.006.
Frahm M, Goswami ND, Owzar K, Hecker E, Mosher A, Cadogan E, Nahid P, Ferrari G, Stout JE. Discriminating between latent and active tuberculosis with multiple biomarker responses. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2011 May;91(3):250–256.
Journal cover image

Published In

Tuberculosis (Edinb)

DOI

EISSN

1873-281X

Publication Date

May 2011

Volume

91

Issue

3

Start / End Page

250 / 256

Location

Scotland

Related Subject Headings

  • Tuberculosis
  • Tuberculin Test
  • Mycobacterium tuberculosis
  • Middle Aged
  • Microbiology
  • Male
  • Latent Tuberculosis
  • Interleukin-15
  • Humans
  • Female