Skip to main content

Assessing the quality of medical information technology economic evaluations: room for improvement.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Eisenstein, EL; Ortiz, M; Anstrom, KJ; Crosslin, DR; Lobach, DF
Published in: AMIA Annu Symp Proc
2006

Medical information systems are being recognized for their ability to improve patient outcomes. While standards for the economic evaluation of medical technologies were instituted in the mid-1990s, little is known about their application in medical information technology studies. In a review of medical information technology evaluation studies published between 1982 and 2002, we found that the volume and variety of economic evaluations had increased; however, investigators routinely omitted key cost or effectiveness elements in their designs, resulting in publications with incomplete, and potentially biased, economic findings. Of the studies that made economic claims, 23% did not report any economic data, 40% failed to include any effectiveness measures, and more than 50% used a case study or pre- post- test design. Thus, during a time when health economic study methods in general have experienced significant development, there is little evidence of similar progress in medical information technology economic evaluations.

Duke Scholars

Published In

AMIA Annu Symp Proc

EISSN

1942-597X

Publication Date

2006

Volume

2006

Start / End Page

234 / 238

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Technology Assessment, Biomedical
  • Medical Informatics Applications
  • Medical Informatics
  • Information Systems
  • Evaluation Studies as Topic
  • Costs and Cost Analysis
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Eisenstein, E. L., Ortiz, M., Anstrom, K. J., Crosslin, D. R., & Lobach, D. F. (2006). Assessing the quality of medical information technology economic evaluations: room for improvement. AMIA Annu Symp Proc, 2006, 234–238.
Eisenstein, Eric L., Maqui Ortiz, Kevin J. Anstrom, David R. Crosslin, and David F. Lobach. “Assessing the quality of medical information technology economic evaluations: room for improvement.AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2006 (2006): 234–38.
Eisenstein EL, Ortiz M, Anstrom KJ, Crosslin DR, Lobach DF. Assessing the quality of medical information technology economic evaluations: room for improvement. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006;2006:234–8.
Eisenstein, Eric L., et al. “Assessing the quality of medical information technology economic evaluations: room for improvement.AMIA Annu Symp Proc, vol. 2006, 2006, pp. 234–38.
Eisenstein EL, Ortiz M, Anstrom KJ, Crosslin DR, Lobach DF. Assessing the quality of medical information technology economic evaluations: room for improvement. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006;2006:234–238.

Published In

AMIA Annu Symp Proc

EISSN

1942-597X

Publication Date

2006

Volume

2006

Start / End Page

234 / 238

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Technology Assessment, Biomedical
  • Medical Informatics Applications
  • Medical Informatics
  • Information Systems
  • Evaluation Studies as Topic
  • Costs and Cost Analysis