Skip to main content

Differences in afterdischarge threshold determination methods: implications for experimental designs.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Swartzwelder, HS; Mobray, DA
Published in: Neurobehav Toxicol
1980

Hippocampal afterdischarge (AD) thresholds were determined twice using different threshold determination methods. Fourty-five days later thresholds were redetermined using each of the methods. Method A [3] produced higher AD thresholds which were less stable over time than were those produced using method B [4]. In addition, threshold level ADs produced using method A were of longer duration in the second phase of the experiment than in the first. No such changes were seen over time in the durations of method B ADs.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Neurobehav Toxicol

ISSN

0191-3581

Publication Date

1980

Volume

2

Issue

1

Start / End Page

59 / 61

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Time Factors
  • Research Design
  • Rats
  • Male
  • Hippocampus
  • Electric Stimulation
  • Differential Threshold
  • Animals
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Swartzwelder, H. S., & Mobray, D. A. (1980). Differences in afterdischarge threshold determination methods: implications for experimental designs. Neurobehav Toxicol, 2(1), 59–61.
Swartzwelder, H. S., and D. A. Mobray. “Differences in afterdischarge threshold determination methods: implications for experimental designs.Neurobehav Toxicol 2, no. 1 (1980): 59–61.
Swartzwelder, H. S., and D. A. Mobray. “Differences in afterdischarge threshold determination methods: implications for experimental designs.Neurobehav Toxicol, vol. 2, no. 1, 1980, pp. 59–61.

Published In

Neurobehav Toxicol

ISSN

0191-3581

Publication Date

1980

Volume

2

Issue

1

Start / End Page

59 / 61

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Time Factors
  • Research Design
  • Rats
  • Male
  • Hippocampus
  • Electric Stimulation
  • Differential Threshold
  • Animals