Skip to main content
construction release_alert
Scholars@Duke will be undergoing maintenance April 11-15. Some features may be unavailable during this time.
cancel
Journal cover image

3-D comparative study of proton vs. x-ray radiation therapy for rectal cancer.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Tatsuzaki, H; Urie, MM; Willett, CG
Published in: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
1992

To assess the usefulness of proton beams for treatment of patients with rectal cancer, we have performed comparative 3D treatment planning for proton beam and x-ray beam therapy. Three common x-ray techniques (AP-PA, 3-field, and 4-field box), a proton beam only plan, and a proton boost plan were compared. The plan which would have been treated without the aid of the 3D planning system was also simulated. Dose distributions were analyzed and dose-volume histograms computed for the target volumes and critical normal tissues. Analyses of these plans demonstrate that the proton beam techniques reduce the volume of small bowel irradiated. This may allow higher doses to be delivered to the tumor, with a probable increase in local control, or a reduction in normal tissue complications probability. All the plans developed with the 3D planning system treated significantly less bowel than the one planned without it.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

DOI

ISSN

0360-3016

Publication Date

1992

Volume

22

Issue

2

Start / End Page

369 / 374

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • X-Rays
  • Rectal Neoplasms
  • Radiotherapy, High-Energy
  • Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
  • Protons
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • Male
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
  • Humans
  • Aged
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Tatsuzaki, H., Urie, M. M., & Willett, C. G. (1992). 3-D comparative study of proton vs. x-ray radiation therapy for rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 22(2), 369–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(92)90056-n
Tatsuzaki, H., M. M. Urie, and C. G. Willett. “3-D comparative study of proton vs. x-ray radiation therapy for rectal cancer.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 22, no. 2 (1992): 369–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(92)90056-n.
Tatsuzaki H, Urie MM, Willett CG. 3-D comparative study of proton vs. x-ray radiation therapy for rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1992;22(2):369–74.
Tatsuzaki, H., et al. “3-D comparative study of proton vs. x-ray radiation therapy for rectal cancer.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, vol. 22, no. 2, 1992, pp. 369–74. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/0360-3016(92)90056-n.
Tatsuzaki H, Urie MM, Willett CG. 3-D comparative study of proton vs. x-ray radiation therapy for rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1992;22(2):369–374.
Journal cover image

Published In

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

DOI

ISSN

0360-3016

Publication Date

1992

Volume

22

Issue

2

Start / End Page

369 / 374

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • X-Rays
  • Rectal Neoplasms
  • Radiotherapy, High-Energy
  • Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
  • Protons
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • Male
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
  • Humans
  • Aged