Skip to main content
construction release_alert
Scholars@Duke will be undergoing maintenance April 11-15. Some features may be unavailable during this time.
cancel
Journal cover image

Decoupling of DNA damage response signaling from DNA damages underlies temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma cells.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Cui, B; Johnson, SP; Bullock, N; Ali-Osman, F; Bigner, DD; Friedman, HS
Published in: J Biomed Res
November 2010

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor in adults. Current therapy includes surgery, radiation and chemotherapy with temozolomide (TMZ). Major determinants of clinical response to TMZ include methylation status of the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter and mismatch repair (MMR) status. Though the MGMT promoter is methylated in 45% of cases, for the first nine months of follow-up, TMZ does not change survival outcome. Furthermore, MMR deficiency makes little contribution to clinical resistance, suggesting that there exist unrecognized mechanisms of resistance. We generated paired GBM cell lines whose resistance was attributed to neither MGMT nor MMR. We show that, responding to TMZ, these cells exhibit a decoupling of DNA damage response (DDR) from ongoing DNA damages. They display methylation-resistant synthesis in which ongoing DNA synthesis is not inhibited. They are also defective in the activation of the S and G2 phase checkpoint. DDR proteins ATM, Chk2, MDC1, NBS1 and gammaH2AX also fail to form discrete foci. These results demonstrate that failure of DDR may play an active role in chemoresistance to TMZ. DNA damages by TMZ are repaired by MMR proteins in a futile, reiterative process, which activates DDR signaling network that ultimately leads to the onset of cell death. GBM cells may survive genetic insults in the absence of DDR. We anticipate that our findings will lead to more studies that seek to further define the role of DDR in ultimately determining the fate of a tumor cell in response to TMZ and other DNA methylators.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Biomed Res

DOI

ISSN

1674-8301

Publication Date

November 2010

Volume

24

Issue

6

Start / End Page

424 / 435

Location

China

Related Subject Headings

  • 1004 Medical Biotechnology
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Cui, B., Johnson, S. P., Bullock, N., Ali-Osman, F., Bigner, D. D., & Friedman, H. S. (2010). Decoupling of DNA damage response signaling from DNA damages underlies temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma cells. J Biomed Res, 24(6), 424–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1674-8301(10)60057-7
Cui, Bo, Stewart P. Johnson, Nancy Bullock, Francis Ali-Osman, Darell D. Bigner, and Henry S. Friedman. “Decoupling of DNA damage response signaling from DNA damages underlies temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma cells.J Biomed Res 24, no. 6 (November 2010): 424–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1674-8301(10)60057-7.
Cui B, Johnson SP, Bullock N, Ali-Osman F, Bigner DD, Friedman HS. Decoupling of DNA damage response signaling from DNA damages underlies temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma cells. J Biomed Res. 2010 Nov;24(6):424–35.
Cui, Bo, et al. “Decoupling of DNA damage response signaling from DNA damages underlies temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma cells.J Biomed Res, vol. 24, no. 6, Nov. 2010, pp. 424–35. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/S1674-8301(10)60057-7.
Cui B, Johnson SP, Bullock N, Ali-Osman F, Bigner DD, Friedman HS. Decoupling of DNA damage response signaling from DNA damages underlies temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma cells. J Biomed Res. 2010 Nov;24(6):424–435.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Biomed Res

DOI

ISSN

1674-8301

Publication Date

November 2010

Volume

24

Issue

6

Start / End Page

424 / 435

Location

China

Related Subject Headings

  • 1004 Medical Biotechnology