Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Ultrasound densitometric analysis: Comparison between an online digital acquisition acoustic program and an offline analog program

Publication ,  Journal Article
Fernandez, AP; Aronson, S; Toledano, A; Winkelmann, J; Saldivar, J; Feinstein, SB
Published in: Echocardiography
January 1, 1996

Videodensitometric analysis of myocardial contrast echocardiography is traditionally performed off line. Recently, an online contrast ultrasound analysis system, Acoustic Densitometry (Hewlett-Packard), was introduced. We compared pixel intensities acquired with Acoustic Densitometry to pixel intensities derived from videodensitometry. A tissue phantom was imaged in phase I using three transducer frequencies (2.5, 3.5, and 5.0 MHz). In phase II, an in vitro flowing tube model with various concentrations of Albunex® was imaged at two flow rates, 0.6 and 1.2 m/sec, and at two transducer frequencies, 2.5 and 3.5 MHz. The relationship between pixel intensities yielded by the two systems for identical ultrasound signals was determined with linear regression. Intensities derived with Acoustic Densitometry strongly correlated with those derived from the offline videodensitometry system. The intensities were related by a predictive multiplicative factor based on display characteristics of the two systems. These results suggest that semiquantitative, online perfusion analysis with Acoustic Densitometry is as sensitive as analysis offline with videodensitometry.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Echocardiography

DOI

ISSN

0742-2822

Publication Date

January 1, 1996

Volume

13

Issue

5

Start / End Page

489 / 498

Related Subject Headings

  • Cardiovascular System & Hematology
  • 3201 Cardiovascular medicine and haematology
  • 1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Fernandez, A. P., Aronson, S., Toledano, A., Winkelmann, J., Saldivar, J., & Feinstein, S. B. (1996). Ultrasound densitometric analysis: Comparison between an online digital acquisition acoustic program and an offline analog program. Echocardiography, 13(5), 489–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8175.1996.tb00925.x
Fernandez, A. P., S. Aronson, A. Toledano, J. Winkelmann, J. Saldivar, and S. B. Feinstein. “Ultrasound densitometric analysis: Comparison between an online digital acquisition acoustic program and an offline analog program.” Echocardiography 13, no. 5 (January 1, 1996): 489–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8175.1996.tb00925.x.
Fernandez AP, Aronson S, Toledano A, Winkelmann J, Saldivar J, Feinstein SB. Ultrasound densitometric analysis: Comparison between an online digital acquisition acoustic program and an offline analog program. Echocardiography. 1996 Jan 1;13(5):489–98.
Fernandez, A. P., et al. “Ultrasound densitometric analysis: Comparison between an online digital acquisition acoustic program and an offline analog program.” Echocardiography, vol. 13, no. 5, Jan. 1996, pp. 489–98. Scopus, doi:10.1111/j.1540-8175.1996.tb00925.x.
Fernandez AP, Aronson S, Toledano A, Winkelmann J, Saldivar J, Feinstein SB. Ultrasound densitometric analysis: Comparison between an online digital acquisition acoustic program and an offline analog program. Echocardiography. 1996 Jan 1;13(5):489–498.
Journal cover image

Published In

Echocardiography

DOI

ISSN

0742-2822

Publication Date

January 1, 1996

Volume

13

Issue

5

Start / End Page

489 / 498

Related Subject Headings

  • Cardiovascular System & Hematology
  • 3201 Cardiovascular medicine and haematology
  • 1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology