Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Magnetic resonance assessment of response to therapy: tumor change measurement, truth data and error sources.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Jackson, EF; Barboriak, DP; Bidaut, LM; Meyer, CR
Published in: Transl Oncol
December 2009

This article describes methods and issues that are specific to the assessment of change in tumor characteristics as measured using quantitative magnetic resonance (MR) techniques and how this relates to the establishment of quantitative MR imaging (MRI) biomarkers of patient response to therapy. The initial focus is on the various sources of bias and variance in the measurement of microvascular parameters and diffusion parameters as such parameters are being used relatively commonly as secondary or exploratory end points in current phase 1/2 clinical trails of conventional and targeted therapies. Several ongoing initiatives that seek to identify the magnitude of some of the sources of measurement variations are then discussed. Finally, resources being made available through the National Cancer Institute Reference Image Database to Evaluate Response (RIDER) project that might be of use in investigations of quantitative MRI biomarker change analysis are described. These resources include 1) data from phantom-based assessment of system response, including short-term (1 hour) and moderate-term (1 week) contrast response and relaxation time measurement, 2) data obtained from repeated dynamic contrast agent-enhanced MRI studies in intracranial tumors, and 3) data obtained from repeated diffusion MRI studies in both breast and brain. A concluding section briefly discusses issues that must be addressed to allow the transition of MR-based imaging biomarker measures from their current role as secondary/exploratory end points in clinical trials to primary/surrogate markers of response and, ultimately, in clinical application.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Transl Oncol

DOI

EISSN

1936-5233

Publication Date

December 2009

Volume

2

Issue

4

Start / End Page

211 / 215

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • 3211 Oncology and carcinogenesis
  • 3101 Biochemistry and cell biology
  • 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
  • 0601 Biochemistry and Cell Biology
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Jackson, E. F., Barboriak, D. P., Bidaut, L. M., & Meyer, C. R. (2009). Magnetic resonance assessment of response to therapy: tumor change measurement, truth data and error sources. Transl Oncol, 2(4), 211–215. https://doi.org/10.1593/tlo.09241
Jackson, Edward F., Daniel P. Barboriak, Luc M. Bidaut, and Charles R. Meyer. “Magnetic resonance assessment of response to therapy: tumor change measurement, truth data and error sources.Transl Oncol 2, no. 4 (December 2009): 211–15. https://doi.org/10.1593/tlo.09241.
Jackson EF, Barboriak DP, Bidaut LM, Meyer CR. Magnetic resonance assessment of response to therapy: tumor change measurement, truth data and error sources. Transl Oncol. 2009 Dec;2(4):211–5.
Jackson, Edward F., et al. “Magnetic resonance assessment of response to therapy: tumor change measurement, truth data and error sources.Transl Oncol, vol. 2, no. 4, Dec. 2009, pp. 211–15. Pubmed, doi:10.1593/tlo.09241.
Jackson EF, Barboriak DP, Bidaut LM, Meyer CR. Magnetic resonance assessment of response to therapy: tumor change measurement, truth data and error sources. Transl Oncol. 2009 Dec;2(4):211–215.
Journal cover image

Published In

Transl Oncol

DOI

EISSN

1936-5233

Publication Date

December 2009

Volume

2

Issue

4

Start / End Page

211 / 215

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • 3211 Oncology and carcinogenesis
  • 3101 Biochemistry and cell biology
  • 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
  • 0601 Biochemistry and Cell Biology