Evaluation of pediatric skull fracture imaging techniques.

Published

Journal Article

Radiologic imaging is crucial in the diagnosis of skull fracture, but there is some doubt as to whether different imaging modalities can accurately identify fractures present on a human skull. While studies have been performed to evaluate the efficacy of radiologic imaging at other anatomical locations, there have been no systematic studies comparing various CT techniques, including high resolution imaging with and without 3D reconstructions to conventional radiologic imaging in children, we investigated which imaging modalities: high-resolution CT scan with 3D projections, clinical-resolution CT scans or X-rays, best showed fracture occurrence in a pediatric human cadaver skull by having an expert pediatric radiologist examine radiologic images from fractured skulls. The skulls used were taken from pediatric cadavers ranging in age from 5 months to 16 years. We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity for the imaging modalities using dissection findings as the gold standard. We found that high-resolution CT scans with 3D projections and conventional CT provided the most accurate fracture diagnosis (single-fracture sensitivity of 71%) followed by X-rays (single-fracture sensitivity of 63%). Linear fractures outsider the region of the sutures were more identifiable than diastatic fractures, though the incidence of false positives was greater for linear fractures. In the two cases where multiple fractures were present on the same anatomical skull location, the radiologist was less likely to identify the presence of additional fractures than a single fracture. Overall, the high-resolution and clinical-resolution CT scans had the similar accuracy for detecting skull fractures while the use of the X-ray was both less accurate and had a lower specificity.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Mulroy, MH; Loyd, AM; Frush, DP; Verla, TG; Myers, BS; Bass, CRD

Published Date

  • January 10, 2012

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 214 / 1-3

Start / End Page

  • 167 - 172

PubMed ID

  • 21880443

Pubmed Central ID

  • 21880443

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1872-6283

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.07.050

Language

  • eng

Conference Location

  • Ireland