Skip to main content

Reducing door-to-needle time: Treatment delay versus presentation delay

Publication ,  Journal Article
Bracken, J; Becker, RC; Zweifler, A; Rawles, JM
Published in: Clinical Cardiology
1997

One of the primary goals of the current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for treating patients with AMI is reduction of treatment delay. Delays consist of three phases: time from onset of symptoms to call for help, prehospital care and transportation, and door-to-treatment time. In turn, door-to-treatment time, the delay probably most amenable to change, consists of three distinct intervals: door- to-data, or diagnosis; data-ta-decision (which therapy); and decision-to- drug administration. Care should be initiated in the emergency department (ED). Along with ready accessibility of electrocardiograms, interdepartmental protocols that facilitate diagnosis in the ED have been shown to reduce the door-to-data delay. Systems that expedite the exceptional cardiologist consult help speed the time to decision. Along with standing orders for standard care, orally obtained informed consent and availability of the drag in the ED can substantially decrease delay in drug delivery. By reducing unnecessary delays, standardization of protocols for diagnosing and treating patients with AMI in the ED may substantially decrease mortality and morbidity.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Clinical Cardiology

ISSN

0160-9289

Publication Date

1997

Volume

20

Issue

11 SUPPL.

Start / End Page

III21 / III25

Related Subject Headings

  • Cardiovascular System & Hematology
  • 1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Bracken, J., Becker, R. C., Zweifler, A., & Rawles, J. M. (1997). Reducing door-to-needle time: Treatment delay versus presentation delay. Clinical Cardiology, 20(11 SUPPL.), III21–III25.
Bracken, J., R. C. Becker, A. Zweifler, and J. M. Rawles. “Reducing door-to-needle time: Treatment delay versus presentation delay.” Clinical Cardiology 20, no. 11 SUPPL. (1997): III21–25.
Bracken J, Becker RC, Zweifler A, Rawles JM. Reducing door-to-needle time: Treatment delay versus presentation delay. Clinical Cardiology. 1997;20(11 SUPPL.):III21–5.
Bracken, J., et al. “Reducing door-to-needle time: Treatment delay versus presentation delay.” Clinical Cardiology, vol. 20, no. 11 SUPPL., 1997, pp. III21–25.
Bracken J, Becker RC, Zweifler A, Rawles JM. Reducing door-to-needle time: Treatment delay versus presentation delay. Clinical Cardiology. 1997;20(11 SUPPL.):III21–III25.

Published In

Clinical Cardiology

ISSN

0160-9289

Publication Date

1997

Volume

20

Issue

11 SUPPL.

Start / End Page

III21 / III25

Related Subject Headings

  • Cardiovascular System & Hematology
  • 1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology