Respiratory controversies in the critical care setting

Journal Article

Definitive evidence to settle the important clinical controversies we debated in this Journal Conference are not yet available. More randomized controlled trials are clearly needed for all of the topics presented. Additionally, neonatal and pediatric data are clearly lacking on most of these questions. The key points in many of the conversations on these controversial topics focused on the balance between efficacy and safety. When safety data exist without efficacy data, the uncontrolled variables often become the knowledge, experience, and support available in an individual intensive care unit. "New" therapies have the potential to help many patients but also have the potential to do great harm if clinicians do not follow standard guidelines and/or do not have the knowledge to use the therapy appropriately. It is clear that some current standards of care will be overthrown by future data while others will be finally substantiated. This Journal Conference queried the status quo to better enable clinicians to make informed decisions in the care of their critically ill patients. © 2007 Daedalus Enterprises.

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Cheifetz, IM; MacIntyre, NR

Published Date

  • May 1, 2007

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 52 / 5

Start / End Page

  • 636 - 644

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

  • 0020-1324

Citation Source

  • Scopus