Skip to main content

Comparison of phase contrast and electron microscopic methods for evaluation of occupational asbestos exposures

Publication ,  Journal Article
Dement, JM; Wallingford, KM
Published in: Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
January 1, 1990

Historic air samples collected in the asbestos textile, the friction products, and the cement products industries using chry- sotile asbestos during 1964—1971 were analyzed by counting and sizing asbestos fibers by phase contrast optical microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. The proportion of airborne fibers longer than 5 (Am in length was found to be significantly different for different industries and operations with a range of 5.0-20.4 percent. Multiple linear regression analyses relating fiber concentrations by phase contrast and electron microscopy methods demonstrated a good correlation for fibers longer than 5 (Am. The phase contrast method was found to be a poor predictor of total fiber exposures (all lengths) as measured by transmission electron microscopy. Airborne fibers in the textile industry were found to have longer lengths than those in the cement pipe or the friction products industries. These differences may be important when comparing morbidity and mortality data from different industrial sectors. Dement, J.M., Wallingford, K.M.: Comparison of Phase Contrast and Electron Microscopic Methods for Evaluation of Occupational Asbestos Exposures. Appl. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 5:242-247, 1990. © 1990 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene

DOI

ISSN

1047-322X

Publication Date

January 1, 1990

Volume

5

Issue

4

Start / End Page

242 / 247

Related Subject Headings

  • Environmental & Occupational Health
  • 1117 Public Health and Health Services
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Dement, J. M., & Wallingford, K. M. (1990). Comparison of phase contrast and electron microscopic methods for evaluation of occupational asbestos exposures. Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 5(4), 242–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047322X.1990.10389630
Dement, J. M., and K. M. Wallingford. “Comparison of phase contrast and electron microscopic methods for evaluation of occupational asbestos exposures.” Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 5, no. 4 (January 1, 1990): 242–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047322X.1990.10389630.
Dement JM, Wallingford KM. Comparison of phase contrast and electron microscopic methods for evaluation of occupational asbestos exposures. Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene. 1990 Jan 1;5(4):242–7.
Dement, J. M., and K. M. Wallingford. “Comparison of phase contrast and electron microscopic methods for evaluation of occupational asbestos exposures.” Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, vol. 5, no. 4, Jan. 1990, pp. 242–47. Scopus, doi:10.1080/1047322X.1990.10389630.
Dement JM, Wallingford KM. Comparison of phase contrast and electron microscopic methods for evaluation of occupational asbestos exposures. Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene. 1990 Jan 1;5(4):242–247.

Published In

Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene

DOI

ISSN

1047-322X

Publication Date

January 1, 1990

Volume

5

Issue

4

Start / End Page

242 / 247

Related Subject Headings

  • Environmental & Occupational Health
  • 1117 Public Health and Health Services