Skip to main content

Health economics of screening for gynaecological cancers.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Kulasingam, S; Havrilesky, L
Published in: Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol
April 2012

In this chapter, we summarise findings from recent cost-effectiveness analyses of screening for cervical cancer and ovarian cancer. We begin with a brief summary of key issues that affect the cost-effectiveness of screening, including disease burden, and availability and type of screening tests. For cervical cancer, we discuss the potential effect of human papilloma virus vaccines on screening. Outstanding epidemiological and cost-effectiveness issues are included. For cervical cancer, this includes incorporating the long-term effect of treatment (including adverse birth outcomes in treated women who are of reproductive age) into cost-effectiveness models using newly available trial data to identify the best strategy for incorporating human papilloma virus tests. A second issue is the need for additional data on human papilloma virus vaccines, such as effectiveness of reduced cancer incidence and mortality, effectiveness in previously exposed women and coverage. Definitive data on these parameters will allow us to update model-based analyses to include more realistic estimates, and also potentially dramatically alter our approach to screening. For ovarian cancer, outstanding issues include confirming within the context of a trial that screening is effective for reducing mortality and incorporating tests with high specificity into screening into screening algorithms for ovarian cancer.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol

DOI

EISSN

1532-1932

Publication Date

April 2012

Volume

26

Issue

2

Start / End Page

163 / 173

Location

Netherlands

Related Subject Headings

  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
  • Papillomavirus Vaccines
  • Ovarian Neoplasms
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Early Detection of Cancer
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • 4204 Midwifery
  • 3215 Reproductive medicine
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Kulasingam, S., & Havrilesky, L. (2012). Health economics of screening for gynaecological cancers. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 26(2), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2011.10.013
Kulasingam, Shalini, and Laura Havrilesky. “Health economics of screening for gynaecological cancers.Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 26, no. 2 (April 2012): 163–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2011.10.013.
Kulasingam S, Havrilesky L. Health economics of screening for gynaecological cancers. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2012 Apr;26(2):163–73.
Kulasingam, Shalini, and Laura Havrilesky. “Health economics of screening for gynaecological cancers.Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, vol. 26, no. 2, Apr. 2012, pp. 163–73. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2011.10.013.
Kulasingam S, Havrilesky L. Health economics of screening for gynaecological cancers. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2012 Apr;26(2):163–173.

Published In

Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol

DOI

EISSN

1532-1932

Publication Date

April 2012

Volume

26

Issue

2

Start / End Page

163 / 173

Location

Netherlands

Related Subject Headings

  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
  • Papillomavirus Vaccines
  • Ovarian Neoplasms
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Early Detection of Cancer
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • 4204 Midwifery
  • 3215 Reproductive medicine