Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Impact of a chemoresponse assay on treatment costs for recurrent ovarian cancer.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Havrilesky, LJ; Krivak, TC; Mucenski, JW; Myers, ER
Published in: Am J Obstet Gynecol
August 2010

OBJECTIVE: We sought to estimate mean costs of chemotherapy treatment for recurrent ovarian cancer with or without use of a chemoresponse assay. STUDY DESIGN: We estimated mean costs for 3 groups: (1) assay assisted: 75 women who received oncologist's choice of chemotherapy following chemoresponse testing (65% adherence to test results), (2) assay adherent: modeled group assuming 100% adherence to assay results, and (3) empiric: modeled from market share data on most frequently utilized chemotherapy regimens. Cost estimates were based on commercial claims database reimbursements. RESULTS: The most common chemotherapy regimens used were topotecan, doxorubicin, and carboplatin/paclitaxel. Mean chemotherapy costs for 6 cycles were $48,758 (empiric), $33,187 (assay assisted), and $23,986 (assay adherent). The cost savings related to the assay were associated with a shift from higher- to lower-cost chemotherapy regimens and lower use of supportive drugs such as hematopoiesis-stimulating agents. CONCLUSION: Assay-assisted chemotherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer may result in reduced costs compared to empiric therapy.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Am J Obstet Gynecol

DOI

EISSN

1097-6868

Publication Date

August 2010

Volume

203

Issue

2

Start / End Page

160.e1 / 160.e7

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Treatment Failure
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Ovarian Neoplasms
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
  • Middle Aged
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Havrilesky, L. J., Krivak, T. C., Mucenski, J. W., & Myers, E. R. (2010). Impact of a chemoresponse assay on treatment costs for recurrent ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 203(2), 160.e1-160.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.054
Havrilesky, Laura J., Thomas C. Krivak, John W. Mucenski, and Evan R. Myers. “Impact of a chemoresponse assay on treatment costs for recurrent ovarian cancer.Am J Obstet Gynecol 203, no. 2 (August 2010): 160.e1-160.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.054.
Havrilesky LJ, Krivak TC, Mucenski JW, Myers ER. Impact of a chemoresponse assay on treatment costs for recurrent ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug;203(2):160.e1-160.e7.
Havrilesky, Laura J., et al. “Impact of a chemoresponse assay on treatment costs for recurrent ovarian cancer.Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 203, no. 2, Aug. 2010, pp. 160.e1-160.e7. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.054.
Havrilesky LJ, Krivak TC, Mucenski JW, Myers ER. Impact of a chemoresponse assay on treatment costs for recurrent ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug;203(2):160.e1-160.e7.
Journal cover image

Published In

Am J Obstet Gynecol

DOI

EISSN

1097-6868

Publication Date

August 2010

Volume

203

Issue

2

Start / End Page

160.e1 / 160.e7

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Treatment Failure
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Ovarian Neoplasms
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
  • Middle Aged
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Drug Resistance, Neoplasm