Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Contemporary results for proximal aortic replacement in North America.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Williams, JB; Peterson, ED; Zhao, Y; O'Brien, SM; Andersen, ND; Miller, DC; Chen, EP; Hughes, GC
Published in: J Am Coll Cardiol
September 25, 2012

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to characterize operative outcomes for ascending aorta and arch replacement on a national scale and to develop risk models for mortality and major morbidity. BACKGROUND: Contemporary outcomes for ascending aorta and arch replacement in North America are unknown. METHODS: We queried the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database for patients undergoing ascending aorta (with or without root) with or without arch replacement from 2004 to 2009. The database captured 45,894 cases, including 12,702 root, 22,048 supracoronary ascending alone, 6,786 ascending plus arch, and 4,358 root plus arch. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were analyzed. A parsimonious multivariable logistic regression model was constructed to predict risks of mortality and major morbidity. RESULTS: Operative mortality was 3.4% for elective cases and 15.4% for nonelective cases. A risk model for operative mortality (c-index 0.81) revealed a risk-adjusted odds ratio for death after emergent versus elective operation of 5.9 (95% confidence interval: 5.3 to 6.6). Among elective patients, end-stage renal disease and reoperative status were the strongest predictors of mortality (adjusted odds ratios: 4.0 [95% confidence interval: 2.6 to 6.4] and 2.3 (95% confidence interval: 1.9 to 2.7], respectively; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Current outcomes for ascending aorta and arch replacement in North America are excellent for elective repair; however, results deteriorate for nonelective status, suggesting that increased screening and/or lowering thresholds for elective intervention could potentially improve outcomes. The predictive models presented may serve clinicians in counseling patients.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

J Am Coll Cardiol

DOI

EISSN

1558-3597

Publication Date

September 25, 2012

Volume

60

Issue

13

Start / End Page

1156 / 1162

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Risk Assessment
  • Postoperative Complications
  • North America
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Logistic Models
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Cohort Studies
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Williams, J. B., Peterson, E. D., Zhao, Y., O’Brien, S. M., Andersen, N. D., Miller, D. C., … Hughes, G. C. (2012). Contemporary results for proximal aortic replacement in North America. J Am Coll Cardiol, 60(13), 1156–1162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.06.023
Williams, Judson B., Eric D. Peterson, Yue Zhao, Sean M. O’Brien, Nicholas D. Andersen, D Craig Miller, Edward P. Chen, and G Chad Hughes. “Contemporary results for proximal aortic replacement in North America.J Am Coll Cardiol 60, no. 13 (September 25, 2012): 1156–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.06.023.
Williams JB, Peterson ED, Zhao Y, O’Brien SM, Andersen ND, Miller DC, et al. Contemporary results for proximal aortic replacement in North America. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Sep 25;60(13):1156–62.
Williams, Judson B., et al. “Contemporary results for proximal aortic replacement in North America.J Am Coll Cardiol, vol. 60, no. 13, Sept. 2012, pp. 1156–62. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.06.023.
Williams JB, Peterson ED, Zhao Y, O’Brien SM, Andersen ND, Miller DC, Chen EP, Hughes GC. Contemporary results for proximal aortic replacement in North America. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Sep 25;60(13):1156–1162.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Am Coll Cardiol

DOI

EISSN

1558-3597

Publication Date

September 25, 2012

Volume

60

Issue

13

Start / End Page

1156 / 1162

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Risk Assessment
  • Postoperative Complications
  • North America
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Logistic Models
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Cohort Studies